Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,715,988 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Odenwalt v. Gillis.


U.S. District Court

CHILDREN

CONTACT VISITS

Odenwalt v. Gillis, 327 F.Supp.2d 502 (M.D.Pa. 2004). A convicted sex offender sex offender n. generic term for all persons convicted of crimes involving sex, including rape, molestation, sexual harassment and pornography production or distribution.  filed a federal civil rights action alleging that state correctional officials had violated his constitutional rights by denying him contact visits with his minor children. The district court dismissed the action, finding that the offender's Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment, addition to the U.S. Constitution, adopted 1868. The amendment comprises five sections. Section 1


Section 1 of the amendment declares that all persons born or naturalized in the United States are American citizens and citizens
 rights were not violated. The court held that the no-contact regulation was supported by legitimate penological pe·nol·o·gy also poe·nol·o·gy  
n.
The study, theory, and practice of prison management and criminal rehabilitation.



[Latin poena, penalty (from Greek
 interests, and non-contact visits were offered as an alternative. According to the court, accommodating the request would have impaired prison officials' ability to protect children on the premises, and there was no ready alternative that did not impose significant costs on the prison. (State Correctional Institution, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania Camp Hill is a borough in Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, 2 miles (3.5 km) southwest of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. The population was 7,636 at the 2000 census. There are many large corporations based in nearby East Pennsboro Township that use the Camp Hill postal address, including )
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment and United States Constitution. 14th Amendment
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U2PA
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:127
Previous Article:King v. Frank.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment and United States Constitution. 1st Amendment)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Wirsching v. Colorado.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: WORK.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: DISCIPLINE REMOVAL FROM JOB.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
Ali v. District of Columbia.(violation of constitutional rights and Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993)(Brief Article)
Vore v. U.S. Dept. of Justice.(Department of Justice's violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)
Wever v. Lincoln County, Nebraska.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(Brief Article)
Wever v. Lincoln County, Nebraska.(violation of United States Constitution. 14th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Davis v. Hall.(due process of law)(Brief Article)
Odenwalt v. Gillis.(civil rights case)(Brief Article)
Donhauser v. Goord.(civil rights suit)(Brief Article)
Donhauser v. Goord.(prisoner seeking declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles