Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,815,112 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Obama's "snitch line" violates the federal privacy act.


Earlier this month, the White House unveiled a new section of its website called "Reality Check," which retails stale Obama talking points on healthcare and also included a snitch line for Obama supporters to inform the White House on opponents of Obamacare. The snitch line, also unveiled on the White House blog, asked: "Since we can't keep track of all of them here at the White House, we're asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov."

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

The obvious concern is that the new snitch line will enable the Obama administration to build an "enemies list," just as Richard Nixon did during his stay in the White House.

The problem with Obama's snitch line is that it violates the federal Privacy Act of 1974, which Congress passed in an attempt to avoid another Nixon-style "enemies list." Former judge and Fox News Channel commentator Andrew Napolitano explained that the White House has put itself into a legal conundrum on this issue. "There's also a statute that requires the White House to retain all communications that it receives. It can't try to rewrite history by pretending it didn't receive anything," Napolitano told Fox News on August 7. "If the White House deletes anything, it violates one statute. If the White House collects data on the free speech, it violates another statute."

The White House quietly took down their snitch line at "Reality Check" over the August 8-9 weekend, but the original snitch line message on the White House blog has not been removed as of this writing.

COPYRIGHT 2009 American Opinion Publishing, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Inside Track
Publication:The New American
Article Type:Brief article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Aug 31, 2009
Words:276
Previous Article:Clinton wields and praises the International Criminal Court.(Inside Track)(Hillary Rodham Clinton)(Brief article)
Next Article:Healthcare reform biased against seniors.(Inside Track)
Topics:



Related Articles
The workplace privacy of law enforcement and public employees.
Summary of Selected Internet & E-Commerce Issues for Franchisors and Franchisees.(business)
Physicians Sue to Block HIPAA Privacy Rule.(Health Insurance Portbility and Accountability Act )(Brief Article)
What is a search? Two conceptual flaws in Fourth Amendment doctrine and some hints of a remedy.
Privacy tips.(Technology)(Brief Article)
U.S. appeals court: privacy visits.(Free Speech, Expression, Assoc.)
Employee Benefits And Executive Compensation / Health Law Advisory: HHS Issues Rules Relating To Breach Notification And Related Items Under The...
ObamaCare shocker: send in the social workers.(Extended Inside Track)
Lawsuit claims stimulus violates HIPAA.(PRIVACY)
Could your phone testify against you? Prosecutors are increasingly using cellphone data in court, which raises constitutional issues that pit public...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles