Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,530,286 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Norplant: no problem ... except that it's off the market. (FYI).


Updating a two-year old advisory on the provision and use of Norplant contraceptive contraceptive /con·tra·cep·tive/ (-sep´tiv)
1. diminishing the likelihood of or preventing conception.

2. an agent that so acts.
 implants, the manufacturer of the device has announced some good news and some not-so-good news. (1) In 2000, amid concerns about the effectiveness of the implants from specified lots, Wyeth, the manufacturer, advised health care professionals to stop providing implants from those lots; the company also advised women who already had devices from the lots in question to use a barrier or nonhormonal contraceptive method Noun 1. contraceptive method - birth control by the use of devices (diaphragm or intrauterine device or condom) or drugs or surgery
contraception

birth control, birth prevention, family planning - limiting the number of children born
 to ensure protection. After conducting several product tests, however, Wyeth announced in July that the implants provided the intended level of contraceptive protection and that women no longer needed to use backup methods. At the same time, citing "limitations in product component supplies," the company said that it will not reintroduce Re`in`tro`duce´   

v. t. 1. To introduce again.

Verb 1. reintroduce - introduce anew; "We haven't met in a long time, so let me reintroduce myself"
re-introduce
 the device to the market.

(1.) Wyeth, Back-up contraception no longer required for women using Norplant[R] system, news release, Madison, NJ: Wyeth, July 26, 2002.

FYI "For your information." See digispeak.

FYI - For Your Information
 is compiled and written by Dore Hollander, executive editor of Perspective on Sexual and Reproductive Health Within the framework of WHO's definition of health[1] as a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, reproductive health, or sexual health/hygiene .
COPYRIGHT 2002 The Alan Guttmacher Institute
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Hollander, Dore
Publication:Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Sep 1, 2002
Words:172
Previous Article:In this issue.
Next Article:Big changes in Japan. (FYI).(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Norplant: satisfaction and side-effects. (contraceptive implants)
Comparing Norplant and Depo-Provera. (contraceptive implant vs. injectable progestin)
Birth control, culture and the control of women. (column)
A moral choice: would Norplant simply stop unwanted pregnancies - or increase destructive teen sex? (response to February 1, 1993 National Review...
A better choice. (use of Norplant to prevent teenage pregnancies) (response to article by Douglas J. Besharov in August 9, 1993 issue of National...
Norplant approval in Michigan unmarred by controversy. (family planning program) (On First Reading)
Norplant suits multiplying. (Brief Article)
Norplant users detail pain, losses suffered from contraceptive.
Neurotoxicity of contraceptive implant.(Brief Article)
Norplant litigation: creating an exception to the learned intermediary doctrine.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles