Nonprofits hit by federal budget cuts: organizations, disabled, will feel Medicaid/Medicare reductions.As Congressional leaders continue to As Congressional leaders continue to meet to hash out Verb 1. hash out - speak with others about (something); talk (something) over in detail; have a discussion; "We discussed our household budget" talk over, discuss differences in spending cuts and tax provisions, a study of federal funding paints a bleak picture for nonprofits in the near future. Two items of interest to nonprofits--a tax deduction Tax deduction An expense that a taxpayer is allowed to deduct from taxable income. tax deduction See deduction. for non-itemizers and IRA Ira, in the Bible Ira (ī`rə), in the Bible. 1 Chief officer of David. 2, 3 Two of David's guard. IRA, abbreviation IRA. Charitable Rollover A graphic element in an application or on a Web page that changes its color or shape when the pointer is moved (rolled) over it. See JavaScript rollover. See also n-key rollover. provision--were not part of a tax reconciliation bill approved by the House of Representatives on Dec. 8 by a 234-197 vote. The Senate version of the bill, (The Tax Relief Act of 2005, S. 2020) approved 64-33 on Nov. 18, included language for both items. The measure would allow a charitable deduction for both itemizers and non-itemizers for contributions more than $210 for individuals and $420 for couples, for two years, until Dec. 31, 2007. Approximately 86 million Americans, about two-thirds, file standard, non-itemized tax returns. The IRA Rollover IRA rollover Reinvestment of a lump-sum distribution from an IRA when physical receipt of funds has been taken by the investor. The lump-sum distribution must be deposited in an IRA rollover account within 60 days of receipt to escape taxation. allows tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes. Leaders from both houses will have to try to negotiate a compromise bill in conference. The Senate version also includes provisions for extending the alternative minimum tax (AMT See vPro. ) exemption while the House version keeps President Bush's extension of tax cuts on investment income. "Each is very, very expensive," Gary Bass Gary D. Bass is the founder and Executive Director of OMB Watch. Dr. Bass received a combined doctorate in psychology and education from The University of Michigan. He was President of the Human Services Information Center before founding OMB Watch in 1983. , executive director of OMB Watch OMB Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization based in Washington, DC. OMB Watch was formed by Gary Bass in 1983 to lift the veil of secrecy shrouding the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB). said of the tax cut bills. Charitable issues are very small in terms of dollars in the legislation, he said, but also could change within the conference. According to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. the National Committee on Planned Giving Planned Giving is an area of fundraising that refers to several specific gift types that can be funded with cash or property. These gift vehicles are based on United States tax law. , House Republicans were hoping to begin a conference on the tax reconciliation measure when the Senate returned the week of Dec. 12. House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) announced that he will wait to select conferees until the Senate has taken up the House bill and amended it with the Senate's own language, according to the advocacy group. Senate Majority Leader Dr. Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said the bill likely will not be completed until next year, according to the nonprofit advocacy group, and he expects that the tax reconciliation bill will have to wait until next year as well. "Work is under way to get to conference this week" on S. 2020, Jill Kozeny, communications director for the Senate Finance Committee said Dec. 13, while committee leaders had started meeting about conferees for S. 1932. Spending cuts approved by both houses in recent weeks are quite different. Under the House version (H.R. 4241), passed by a 217-215 margin, $50 billion in cuts were approved, including $11 billion to Medicaid, but none to Medicare, and about $800 million in food stamp programs The US Food Stamp Program is a federal assistance program that provides food to low income people living in the United States. Benefits are distributed by the individual states, but the program is administered through the U.S. Department of Agriculture. . The Senate meanwhile adopted a spending bill (S. 1932) by a 52-47 vote that called for $35 billion in cuts, including $4.3 billion to Medicaid and $5 billion to Medicare. "LSA LSA - Link State Advertisement , by and large, is pleased that the Senate bill provides help for elderly, children and families in need," said Lisa Carr, director of public policy for Lutheran Services in America Lutheran Services in America (LSA) is a not-for-profit corporation that coordinates the work of nearly 300 independent Lutheran social ministry organizations affiliated with the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America or recognized by The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod. (LSA). However, the House bill is more detrimental to people in need. She said the $11 billion in House cuts to Medicaid would hurt beneficiaries by requiring cost sharing and premium increases, and the Congressional Budget Office The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is responsible for economic forecasting and fiscal policy analysis, scorekeeeping, cost projections, and an Annual Report on the Federal Budget. The office also underdakes special budget-related studies at the request of Congress. has estimated that 100,000 people would lose Medicaid coverage altogether due to an inability to pay for the services. LSA provides services to many sectors in the U.S., Carr said, including elderly who rely on Medicaid, children in foster care and institutional care and people with disabilities. Whether or not either bill would be resolved in conference anytime soon remained up in the air at press time. Adam Hughes, budget policy analyst for OMB Watch, said Congress still must tackle appropriations bills and the Patriot Act Patriot Act: see USA PATRIOT Act. , among others, making it unlikely that the tax cut bills will be settled before the end of the calendar year. If a recent study of nonprofit funding is any indication, Fiscal Year 2006 will be just the start of a tough stretch for the sector. Federal budget experts Alan Abramson, director of the Nonprofit Sector Research Fund at The Aspen Institute The Aspen Institute is an international nonprofit organization founded in 1950 dedicated to "fostering enlightened leadership, the appreciation of timeless ideas and values, and open-minded dialogue on contemporary issues. , and Lester Salamon The subject of this article may not satisfy the notability guideline for Biographies. If you are familiar with the subject matter, please expand or rewrite the article to establish its notability. , director of the Center for Civil Society Studies of the Institute for Policy Studies of Johns Hopkins University Johns Hopkins University, mainly at Baltimore, Md. Johns Hopkins in 1867 had a group of his associates incorporated as the trustees of a university and a hospital, endowing each with $3.5 million. Daniel C. , released in the fall an analysis of the fiscal year 2006 through 2010 federal budgets. The future looks bleak, according to the report, The Nonprofit Sector and the Federal Budget: Fiscal Year 2006 and Beyond. And, future federal budgets threaten "turning back the clock" from the nonprofit-supportive policies of recent years to the "fiscal stringency" of the 1980s and 1990s, according to the report. "Federal programs of interest to nonprofit organizations--groups that often serve as the backbone of communities in times of crisis--will be cut between $40 billion and $71.5 billion over the next years," according to The Aspen Institute. Projected budget cuts in "programs of interest to nonprofits," excluding health and income assistance programs, are expected to be slashed by $3.2 billion in the Fiscal Year 2006 budget, followed by $11 billion in 2007, $15.4 billion in 2008, $20.4 billion in 2009, and $21.5 billion in 2010, totaling $71.5 billion over the five years. The experts believe private contributions would have double or triple what is expected in the coming years if the private sector was to make up the cuts. They project a growth of about $26.4 billion in private giving, approximately $45 billion short of the $71 billion cuts. "While the proposed reductions would almost certainly increase demand for nonprofit services, they would simultaneously reduce the funding many nonprofits have available to meet even previous demands," according to the report. "These shortfalls will leave many community groups scrambling to serve those in greatest need, particularly in times of crisis." Abramson said the report did not take into account the proposed charitable provisions, such as the non-itemizer deduction, and how they might affect giving, adding that it would be too early to tell without taking a serious look at specific figures. The shortfall in private giving assumed a 3 percent real growth, after inflation, he said, while the report also assumed Congress would follow through on its spending reductions. According to the report, federal support for nonprofit organizations has grown 135 percent during the last quarter-century, from $122.6 billion in FY 1980 to $288.8 billion in FY 2005; an average increase of about 5.4 percent per year. But most of that growth was "concentrated and accrued to health care providers, especially hospitals," and outside of that field, federal support dropped from $23.5 billion to $17 billion between 1980 and 1988; a decline of an average of 3.5 percent per year. What increases there were to non-health-related nonprofits during the 1990s was due largely to changes in Medicaid and welfare assistance programs, the report stated, funneling support to nonprofit social service providers. Projected Federal Budget Cuts In Programs Of Interest To Nonprofits 2006 -$3.2 2007 -$11.0 2008 -$15.4 2009 -$20.4 2010 -$21.5 Based on President Bush's FY 2006 Budget, excluding Health and Income Assistance Programs Abramson, Aspen Institute, 2005 Note: Table made from bar graph. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion