Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,709,930 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

New treaty with Japan eliminates source-country withholding taxes on royalties.


On Nov. 6, 2003, Treasury Secretary John Snow and Japanese Ambassador Ryozo Kato Ryozo Kato (加藤 良三 Katō Ryōzō  signed a U.S.-Japan income tax treaty (Convention Between the Government of the United States of America UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The name of this country. The United States, now thirty-one in number, are Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire,  and the Government of Japan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Erosion with Respect to Taxes on Income) and protocol that modernizes the existing 1971 treaty. The new ratified treaty makes significant changes to numerous provisions of the existing treaty, including:

* Branch profits tax profits tax nimpuesto sobre los beneficios

profits tax n (Brit) → impôt m sur les bénéfices

profits tax profit (Brit
 elimination (Article 10);

* A qualified exemption from taxes on dividends paid to parent companies with a controlling interest controlling interest

The ownership of a quantity of outstanding corporate stock sufficient to control the actions of the firm. Controlling interest often involves ownership of significantly less than 51% of a firm's outstanding stock because many owners fail
 in the payer (Article 10); and

* Complete elimination of source-country withholding taxes on royalty Synopsis
On Royalty: A Very Polite Inquiry into Some Strangely Related Families is the attempt of Jeremy Paxman to examine and understand how the increasingly irrelevant institution that is Monarchy has managed to continue to hold to the imaginations of the public.
 income (Article 12).

Taking Advantage of New Withholding Rates

The elimination of withholding taxes on royalty income is effective for amounts paid or credited offer June 30, 2004, according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 Article 31. To conform to Verb 1. conform to - satisfy a condition or restriction; "Does this paper meet the requirements for the degree?"
fit, meet

coordinate - be co-ordinated; "These activities coordinate well"
 the new treaty, the two governments also adopted new procedural and documentation rules that U.S. taxpayers need to follow to receive the royally exemption. On June 23, 2004, the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  (in News Release IR 2004-82) and the Japanese National Tax Agency, issued guidance and examples on the treaty's application. The examples offer some insight as to when interest, dividends and royalties are deemed paid when applying the new treaty rates and exemptions.

The Japanese government has also updated its reporting procedures in recently released Form 3, Application Form for Income Tax Convention (Relief from Japanese Income Tax on Royalties). The new form, which is substantially similar to the old form, must he provided to the withholding agent before the date of the payment subject to withholding.

Under a new requirement, U.S. taxpayers claiming treaty benefits must establish that they are U.S. residents, by attaching a residency certification to Form 3. U.S. taxpayers request the certification by submitting new Form 8802, Application far United States Residency Certification, to the IRS. Qualifying U.S. taxpayers will receive Form 6166, Certification of United States Residency, approximately 30 days after such filing. Thus, U.S. taxpayers with existing royalty streams should file Form 8802 to begin qualifying for the exemption.

Conclusion

Given the flow of intangibles and licensing between the U.S. and Japan, the elimination of royalty payments may have a significant effect on trade and taxes paid between the countries. However, a taxpayer must file the required document to be eligible for the new treaty benefits; failure to apply leaves the taxpayer with its current treatment.
COPYRIGHT 2004 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Reinstein, Todd B.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Sep 1, 2004
Words:415
Previous Article:Debt instruments in reorganizations.(From The IRS)
Next Article:Guidance on intercompany interest expense disallowance related to tax-exempt investments.
Topics:



Related Articles
Withholding tax on foreign mortgages.
Clinton's tax plan: royalty and R&E provisions for multinationals. (research and experimentation)
Withholding taxes on foreign partners - a recurring nightmare.
Recent tax treaty developments.
Proposed new anti-conduit regulations.
Trade name licensing in foreign markets.
Withholding and reporting requirement for payments to foreign partnerships.
Current income tax treaty developments.
Software royalty source and withholding.
TEI's recommendations to the new Canadian government for its 2006 Budget Legislation.(Tax Executives Institute)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles