Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,763,846 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

New rules for employee - independent contractor controversies.


Tax Court access for worker classification disputes.

For many years, a central issue in the employer-IRS employment tax controversy was the status of some workers. There were questions about whether particular individuals were employees (in which case employment taxes had to be withheld by the recipient of the workers' services [the service recipient]) or whether they functioned as independent contractors A person who contracts to do work for another person according to his or her own processes and methods; the contractor is not subject to another's control except for what is specified in a mutually binding agreement for a specific job.  (in which case withholding Withholding

Any tax that is taken directly out of an individual's wages or other income before he or she receives the funds.

Notes:
In other words, these funds are "withheld" from your wages.
 was not required).

Typically, this analysis depends heavily on the facts of the worker's individual situation and focuses on factors relating to relating to relate prepconcernant

relating to relate prepbezüglich +gen, mit Bezug auf +acc 
 the kind and degree of control the service recipient exercises.

Similarly, such a determination also is an issue when a service recipient qualified under section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978. Under that provision, if the service recipient satisfied several requirements (basically dealing with consistent and reasonable treatment of workers), it could treat workers as independent contractors and the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  was prohibited pro·hib·it  
tr.v. pro·hib·it·ed, pro·hib·it·ing, pro·hib·its
1. To forbid by authority: Smoking is prohibited in most theaters. See Synonyms at forbid.

2.
 from questioning or reclassifying their status.

Traditionally, the sole means of challenging an IRS worker reclassification Reclassification

The process of changing the class of mutual funds once certain requirements have been met. These requirements are generally placed on load mutual funds. Reclassification is not considered to be a taxable event.
 was to pay the taxes in question and file a suit for refund TO REFUND. To pay back by the party who has received it, to the party who has paid it, money which ought not to have been paid.
     2. On a deficiency of assets, executors and administrators cum testamento annexo, are entitled to have refunded to them legacies
 in either the district court or the Court of Federal Claims. However, the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 included a provision that now allows the Tax Court to review IRS determinations of worker status, thereby giving taxpayers another avenue to pursue. In addition, the Tax Court now has prepayment Prepayment

1. The payment of a debt obligation prior to its due date.

2. The excess payment over a scheduled debt repayment amount.

Notes:
1. Examples include deferred expenses such as rent and early loan repayments.

2.
 jurisdiction over such challenges, and the taxpayer may elect to have the case tried under the Tax Court's simplified "small-case" procedures if the amount of employment tax in dispute is $50,000 or less for each calendar quarter involved.

NOTICE 98-43

The IRS recently issued notice 98-43, which addresses some of the issues involved and explains the procedures available under this new alternative.

Tax Court jurisdiction. Under this notice, the Tax Court's jurisdiction is somewhat limited; the court may not decide employment-related issues that do not arise under the employment tax laws. For example, the Tax Court may not consider the classification of workers as employees for pension purposes or the proper treatment of individual deductions. It may decide only worker classification and section 530 issues resulting from an IRS examination and not from other service determinations (such as letter rulings).

Eligible taxpayers. Only the person for whom the services are provided may file for a refund in Tax Court. Thus, neither the individual workers nor an indirectly involved third party may seek Tax Court review of the IRS's determinations.

Determination requirement. For the new provision to apply, the IRS must have made a "determination" about the status of a worker or the applicability of section 530 relief. This word is narrowly defined; a statutory notice disallowing a refund claim will not suffice suf·fice  
v. suf·ficed, suf·fic·ing, suf·fic·es

v.intr.
1. To meet present needs or requirements; be sufficient: These rations will suffice until next week.
.

As a prerequisite pre·req·ui·site  
adj.
Required or necessary as a prior condition: Competence is prerequisite to promotion.

n.
 for seeking Tax Court review, a taxpayer must have received a Notice of Determination from the IRS that informs the taxpayer of the opportunity to seek Tax Court review and provides information on how to do so. Attached to this notice is a schedule, showing each kind of tax asserted to be due and the proposed adjustments by calendar quarter. (Such amounts are intended to enable the taxpayer to determine whether it is eligible to elect the small-case Tax Court procedures.)

Unless (or until) a taxpayer has received a Notice of Determination, the Tax Court may not begin review of the IRS's determinations regarding worker classification issues. Once the service mails out a Notice of Determination to a taxpayer, the taxpayer has 90 days in which to file a Tax Court petition.

For a detailed discussion of this and other recent developments, see the Tax Clinic, edited by Joseph Tapajna, Steven Ste´ven

n. 1. Voice; speech; language.
Ye have as merry a steven
As any angel hath that is in heaven.
- Chaucer.

2. An outcry; a loud call; a clamor.
To set steven
to make an appointment.
 Corrick and William Ciesar, in the November 1998 issue of The Tax Adviser.

Nicholas Fiore, editor The Tax Adviser
COPYRIGHT 1998 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1998, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:from The Tax Adviser
Author:Fiore, Nicholas
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 1, 1998
Words:623
Previous Article:Line Items.
Next Article:Rethinking internal audits.
Topics:



Related Articles
How employers of independent contractors spell relief. (from the Tax Adviser)
Taxes and public entity employees: the scope of section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978.
Independent contractors: the consequences of reclassification.
Avoiding IRS reclassification of workers as employees.
Smoky Mountain's secret to successfully claiming workers to be independent contractors.
Liberalized worker classification rules provide options for employers.(Brief Article)
How to shift the burden of proof to the IRS on independent contractor status.
How to survive an employment tax audit.
Endangered Species.(Independent contractors)(Brief Article)
Will a tax opinion still prevent penalties?

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles