New proposed regulations on tax-exempt real estate ownership.In 1988, Congress directed the Treasury to formulate formulate /for·mu·late/ (for´mu-lat) 1. to state in the form of a formula. 2. to prepare in accordance with a prescribed or specified method. regulations under Sec. 514(c)(9)(E) on tax-exempt investment in real estate partnerships. The regulations were to be written with two goals in mind. First, the regulations were to eliminate the inconsistencies between the requirements of sub-clauses (I) and (II) of Sec. 514(c)(9)(E). Second, the regulations would limit the transfer of tax benefits from exempt partners to taxable partners who together invest in real estate partnerships. In 1990, the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws. issued Notice 90-41 to provide interim guidance and to request comments. On Dec. 30, 1992, the Treasury issued Prop. Regs. Sec. 1.514(c)-2. Exempt organizations are generally taxable on their unrelated business taxable income Under the federal tax law, gross income reduced by adjustments and allowable deductions. It is the income against which tax rates are applied to compute an individual or entity's tax liability. The essence of taxable income is the accrual of some gain, profit, or benefit to a taxpayer. (UBTI UBTI Unrelated Business Taxable Income ). A percentage of any gross income derived from debt-financed property is treated as UBTI. Sec. 514(c)(9) provides an exception for debt-financed investments in real property by qualified organizations, and Sec. 514(c)(9)(B)(vi) permits the ownership to be through a partnership, limited by Sec. 514(c)(9)(E). Sec. 514(c)(9)(E) has two requirements: (1) The allocation The apportionment or designation of an item for a specific purpose or to a particular place. In the law of trusts, the allocation of cash dividends earned by a stock that makes up the principal of a trust for a beneficiary usually means that the dividends will be treated as of items to any partner that is a qualified organization cannot result in that partner having a share of overall partnership income for any tax year greater than that partner's share of overall partnership loss for the tax year for which that partner's loss share will be the smallest (the fractions rule). (2) Partnership allocations must comply with Sec. 704(b)(2) and the regulations thereunder. For purposes of the fractions rule, overall partnership income or loss includes those items of income, gain, loss and deduction deduction, in logic, form of inference such that the conclusion must be true if the premises are true. For example, if we know that all men have two legs and that John is a man, it is then logical to deduce that John has two legs. that increase or decrease the partner's capital accounts under Regs. Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv). To eliminate inconsistencies between the fractions rule and the Sec. 704(b) requirements, Notice 90-41 excluded several common allocations, such as guaranteed payments and preferred returns, from the computation Computation is a general term for any type of information processing that can be represented mathematically. This includes phenomena ranging from simple calculations to human thinking. of overall partnership income or loss. The proposed regulations clarify, change and add to the allocations and items that may be excluded from overall partnership income or loss, the most important addition being guidance for partnership chargebacks and qualified income offsets. The proposed regulations also provide rules for a change in interest, de minimis An abbreviated form of the Latin Maxim de minimis non curat lex, "the law cares not for small things." A legal doctrine by which a court refuses to consider trifling matters. amounts and tiered partnerships. The proposed regulations apply to partnerships organized, property acquired or interests acquired after Dec. 30, 1992. The fractions rule must be met annually and on a prospective basis in each year in which the partnership holds debt-financed property and has a qualified exempt and taxable partner; a change to a partnership agreement may cause the partnership to violate the fractions rule in the tax year of change and subsequent tax years. Effectively, the proposed regulations are in addition to the Sec. 704(b) regulations. Both sets of regulations provide limitations on the allocation of partnership profits and losses. The proposed regulations go a long way in resolving the internal inconsistencies of Sec. 514(c)(9)(E). Further, the transfer of tax benefits from exempt to taxable partners appears to be limited. The result, however, is a very complex set of rules under which partnership agreements must be carefully written and reviewed; common partnership allocations and transactions can violate the fractions rule, even when the allocation or transaction does not appear abusive Tending to deceive; practicing abuse; prone to ill-treat by coarse, insulting words or harmful acts. Using ill treatment; injurious, improper, hurtful, offensive, reproachful. . |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion