Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,694,495 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

New planning strategies with retirement plans.


One factor that influences the decision of an employer (particularly a small business) to adopt a retirement plan is the extent to which the business's owners will benefit. Recognizing this, Congress enacted the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA EGTRRA Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (also known as EGTRAA 2001) ), which increased the maximum annual amount that employers can contribute to a defined contribution plan Defined contribution plan

A pension plan whose sponsor is responsible only for making specified contributions into the plan on behalf of qualifying participants. Related: Defined benefit plan
, from the lesser of $35,000 or 25% of compensation in 2001 to the lesser of $40,000 or 100% of compensation in 2002. (The $40,000 threshold will be indexed in $1,000 increments.) The EGTRRA also increased the annual compensation that may be taken into account for purposes of determining Contributions and benefits under a plan and for nondiscrimination testing, from $170,000 in 2001 to $200,000 in 2002. (The $200,000 threshold will be indexed in $5,000 increments.)

The above increases have drawn much attention to the fact that employees can now reach the maximum contribution level through a defined contribution plan, so that any existing money-purchase pension plan Money-Purchase Pension Plan

A defined-contribution plan to which employer contributions are fixed.

Notes:
Employers may contribute up to 25% of employees' compensation to a money purchase pension plan.
See also: Defined Benefit, Defined Contribution, Pension Plan
 (MPPP (MultiLink PPP) An extension to the point-to-point protocol that enables two channels to be linked together to double the throughput. It is used for ISDN transmission and channel bonding. See PPP, ISDN and channel bonding. ) could be terminated in 2002 without sacrificing contribution levels.

Conversions of MPPPs are popular with plan sponsors, because they require annual contributions of a set percentage of participants' compensation. Contributions to profit-sharing plans, on the other hand, are discretionary and can be based on whether the plan sponsors can afford to make plan contributions. Given the current economic turmoil, this flexibility could prove valuable to plan sponsors. In fact, in Rev. Rul. 2002-42, the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  clarified some of the tax issues in a merger or conversion of an MPPP into a profit-sharing plan. (For further information, see Tax Trends, "Merger of Pension Plan into Profit-Sharing Plan Is Not Partial Termination," TTA TTA Telecommunications Technology Association (Korea)
TTA Teacher Training Agency (UK)
TTA Triangle Transit Authority (Raleigh/Chapel Hill/Durham, North Carolina, USA) 
, August 2002, p. 545.)

However, little attention has been given to the change in percentage of the compensation level. The EGTRRA effectively increased this percentage from 25% in 2001 to 100% in 2002. With the family-aggregation rules repealed, closely held businesses should consider putting spouses or other family members on the payroll at $40,000 and amending their defined contribution plan to allow for contributing 100% of salary (or $40,000) to their defined contribution plan in 2002. This strategy could really benefit a number of profitable, closely held businesses with few employees who want to increase their retirement savings, while generating significant tax deductions.

FROM ROGER W. LUSBY, III, CPA (Computer Press Association, Landing, NJ) An earlier membership organization founded in 1983 that promoted excellence in computer journalism. Its annual awards honored outstanding examples in print, broadcast and electronic media. The CPA disbanded in 2000. , CMA CMA - Concert Multithread Architecture from DEC. , AEP, FRAZIER & DEETER, LLC, ATLANTA, GA
COPYRIGHT 2002 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Lusby, Roger W., III
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Nov 1, 2002
Words:402
Previous Article:Aging Sec. 457 Plan Regs. rejuvenated.(deferred compensation plans)(IRS proposed regulations)
Next Article:CRTs--using a trust beneficiary.(charitable remainder trusts)
Topics:



Related Articles
Planning for a realistic retirement.
Plan for a comfortable retirement while you save for your children's education. (You Can ...).
New retirement programs available for members.
Pension picking: help your employees boost retirement savings. (Management Advice).
Potential crisis looms in retirement plans.(Banking & Finance Report)(Advertisement)
Publications ...(New Resources)(Advertisement)
#4: dashed expectations.(succession planning (Business))(Brief Article)
HSAs and retirement plans: employers should tailor their contributions to health savings accounts and qualified retirement plans to ensure they...
Employee benefits consultants/managers: ranked by number of L.A. County employees involved in employee benefits services.(BUSINESS...
Adviser's guide to Tax Planning Strategies for Retirement Savings.(now available)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles