NLRB upholds facility's workplace rules.The federal National Labor Relations Board National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), independent agency of the U.S. government created under the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 (Wagner Act), and amended by the acts of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Labor Act) and 1959 (Landrum-Griffin Act), which affirmed labor's right (NLRB) has upheld the right for a nursing home to set workplace policies as long as they don't interfere with employees' right to unionize. In a 3-2 decision, the NLRB stated that a LTC LTC abbr. lieutenant colonel facility's rules prohibiting abusive and profane PROFANE. That which has not been consecrated. By a profane place is understood one which is neither sacred, nor sanctified, nor religious. Dig. 11, 7, 2, 4. Vide Things. language; verbal, mental, and physical abuse; and harassment are lawful, and do not interfere with employees' rights to unionize as granted under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act The National Labor Relations Act (or Wagner Act) is a 1935 United States federal law that protects the rights of most workers in the private sector to organize labor unions, to engage in collective bargaining, and to take part in strikes and other forms of concerted . The board members who did not agree with the majority's decision said the facility's ill-defined rules could cause employees to steer clear of voicing disagreement with their terms and conditions of employment conditions of employment that part of an employment that sets out the duties, responsibilities, hours of work, salary, leave and other privileges to be enjoyed by persons employed, for example a veterinary nurse, in private practice. or vigorously attempting to organize skeptical workers. The dissenting members argued that the facility's rules should be more specific: "Although we agree with our colleagues and the District of Columbia District of Columbia, federal district (2000 pop. 572,059, a 5.7% decrease in population since the 1990 census), 69 sq mi (179 sq km), on the east bank of the Potomac River, coextensive with the city of Washington, D.C. (the capital of the United States). Circuit that employers have a legitimate interest in protecting themselves by maintaining rules that discourage conduct that might result in employer liability ... that interest is appropriately subject to the requirement that employers articulate those rules with sufficient specificity that they do not impinge on employees' free exercise of Section 7 rights." The majority, however, said that where, as in this case, the rule does not refer to Section 7 activity, was not adopted in response to organizational activity, and had never been enforced to restrict Section 7 activity, "we will not conclude that a reasonable employee would read the rule to apply to such activity simply because the rule could be interpreted that way." For more on the NLRB's decision, visit www.nlrb.gov/nlrb/press/releases/r2546.htm. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion