Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,800,280 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

NIH limits gene experiments done abroad.


NIH "Not invented here." See digispeak.

NIH - The United States National Institutes of Health.
 limits gene experiments done abroad

Nobody will ever know exactly what happened after researchers inoculated 20 cows with an experimental rabies vaccine rabies vaccine
n.
1. A vaccine introduced by Pasteur as a method of treatment for the bite of a rabid animal, consisting of 23 daily injections of virus that are increased serially from noninfective doses to doses containing fully infective
 in Argentina nearly three years ago. Accordingly to the Philadelphia-based Wistar Institute The Wistar Institute, an independent nonprofit biomedical research institute in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, is dedicated to discovering the causes and cures for major diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune disorders, and infectious diseases. , which conducted the trials with the Pan American Health Organization The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) is an international public health agency with 100 years of experience in working to improve health and living standards of the countries of the Americas. It serves as the specialized organization for health of the Inter-American System.  (an arm of the World Health Organization), everything went according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 plan. Cows vaccinated with the genetically engineered genetically engineered adjective Recombinant, see there  rabies-virus protein developed antibodies to the deadly virus as intended, and the cows and handlers showed no ill effects.

But the researchers conducted the experiments without first obtaiing permission from the Argentine government. And according to Argentine government scientists and others, some workers and unvaccinated cows became infected with the experimental vaccine--though with no apparent ill effects. The Argentine government halted the experiment, destroyed the cows and provided the impetus for a series of meetings of U.S. scientists and policymakers over the issue of performing U.S.-government-funded genetic engineering experiments in foreign countries. At issue was whether scientists receiving funds or materials from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) must follow the same safety and notification guidelines in foreign countries as they must in the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area.  when performing experiments with recombinant DNA recombinant DNA
n.
Genetically engineered DNA prepared by transplanting or splicing one or more segments of DNA into the chromosomes of an organism from a different species. Such DNA becomes part of the host's genetic makeup and is replicated.
. The trick lay in ensuring that developing nations would not become cheap testing grounds for controversial experiments, without dictating to other countries what they may or may not do in terms of hosting scientific trials that could benefit them directly.

Now, after more than two years of debate triggered by a petition from the Washington, D.C.-based Foundation on Economic Trends, the NIH has revised its guidelines regarding recombinant DNA research in foreign countries. The new guidelines preclude the foreign testing in humans or animals and the deliberate release into the environment of materials containing recombinant DNA developed with NIH funds unless the experiments comply with the host country's rules regarding such experiments. If the host country has not developed such rules -- and many have not -- the proposed experiments must be reviewed by an HIH-approved board, then accepted by an appropriate national authority in the host country. In any case, the new guidelines say, NIH-associated researchers in foreign countries must use safety practices "reasonably consistent" with NIH guidelines governing similar experiments conducted in the United States.
COPYRIGHT 1989 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1989, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Biomedicine; National Institutes of Health
Publication:Science News
Date:Apr 15, 1989
Words:375
Previous Article:Global change: the scientific challenge. (understanding environmental problems of the next century) (includes related article) (second in a two-part...
Next Article:Alliterative prescriptions pose problems. (similar spellings of cephalosporin derivatives) (Biomedicine)
Topics:



Related Articles
Lessons from Asilomar; ten years after the historic conference on the risks of gene-splicing research, scientists look back with a mixture of pride,...
Frost-free bacteria lawsuit. (genetic engineering)
Mixed decision in gene-splice trial. (frost-free bacteria)
Gene-splice approvals on two fronts.
Pig vaccine back on sale; query begins.
NIH panel okays human gene transfer test. (National Institutes of Health)
Groups seek human gene-transfer delay.
Additional human gene transfers sought.
Trouble in the laboratory: probing the science of a controversial paper. (includes related article)
Gene therapists told to do homework. (using PEG-ADA and gene therapy to treat adenosine deaminase deficiency)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles