NEW 'WORLDS' TO EXPLORE TOM CRUISE AND STEVEN SPIELBERG FOCUSED ON FAMILY TO MAKE THEIR 'WAR' A TALE FOR OUR TIME.

Byline: Bob Strauss Film Writer

Every generation gets the ``War of the Worlds'' that suits it.

The new movie adaptation of H.G. Wells' 1898 novel, opening worldwide Wednesday, has everything a modern science-fiction blockbuster should have. There are hundreds of state-of-the-art special effects, Earth's top director (Steven Spielberg) and star (Tom Cruise) running the show, and a fittingly worldwide promotional tour, complete with gossip-generating sideshows for today's ravenous entertainment news media.

But the movie itself reflects deeper concerns of our time. Echoes of the war on terrorism and concerns about family values reverberate throughout the nail-biting narrative, which was written for the screen by Spielberg's ``Jurassic Park'' adapter, David Koepp.

``I've never done anything like this before,'' notes Spielberg, whose work has ranged from the sheer mechanical terror of ``Jaws'' to the hopeful sci-fi of ``E.T.'' to the horrors of history in the likes of ``Schindler's List'' and ``Saving Private Ryan.''

``This is my first foray into looking up at the sky and not seeing beauty but, instead, seeing things that frighten me. Maybe I've been looking up in the sky, like you and other people around the world, and perceiving that there's more tension in the air. It just seems like we live in a more nervous universe; I think I'm just being reactive to my own environment. Today, in the shadow of 9-11, I think this film has found a place in society.''

Yes, these aliens are totally, irredeemably nasty. And the family angle zeros in on Cruise's character, Ray Ferrier, and his two kids, 10- year-old Rachel (Dakota Fanning) and 18-year-old Robbie (Justin Chatwin). Long divorced from his pregnant ex-wife Mary Ann (``Lord of the Rings' '' Miranda Otto), Ray operates a crane on the New Jersey docks, loves cars and knows hardly anything about the children he rarely sees. But when long-dormant alien tripods rise from deep in the Earth and start zapping everything in sight, he must flee with his kids, and go to extreme lengths to keep them safe while they make their way to Mary Ann in Boston.

``When Steven and I started talking about this movie, then when we sat down with David Koepp, the idea was always about family,'' says Cruise. ``What would you do for your family? How far would you go if challenged? Will you be able to protect your family? All these questions.

``We tried to create a guy that we all know,'' the actor continues. ``A man who is not necessarily a bad person, but he just doesn't get it. He doesn't know how to help his children. I think there are those fathers out there; they don't know what to do.''

The Englishman Wells, a founding father of science fiction, was also a left-wing radical who wrote his Martian invasion book as a kind of anti- imperialism parable. Orson Welles' famous 1938 radio broadcast of ``War of the Worlds,'' coming a year before World War II began, was presented as a fake news report that convinced hundreds of thousands of Americans that we were actually under attack. The 1953 movie version (whose stars, Gene Barry and Ann Robinson, make brief appearances in the new film), like many sci-fi films of its time, referenced Cold War paranoia in the early days of the Atomic Age.

But lest we put too much weight on the new film's currency, everyone involved wants to emphasize that their first order of business was to get audiences absorbed in the story. Then, just as important, to frighten them silly.

``It's very satisfying for filmmakers when you can explore very complex ideas and emotional experiences like this in the context of something that is purely entertaining,'' says longtime Spielberg producing partner Kathleen Kennedy. ``We set out to make a scary, exciting piece of entertainment for the summer. It's an added benefit when you can have this level of subtext. ... The idea of any kind of warlike invasion is certainly something that's fresher in people's minds today than it was 15 years ago.''

As for the family angle, it wasn't so much influenced by current political rhetoric, or even Spielberg and Cruise's well-known paternal instincts (the director has seven children, the actor two), as it was a storytelling necessity.

``The narrator travels alone in the book, which is fine,'' Koepp explains. ``But it's a literary device, and they have the liberty in a book of hearing what someone is thinking and feeling. In a movie, we only have what they say and what they do. So Ray needed someone to talk to.''

Making those sounding boards his resentful children, however, opened up all manner of dramatic possibilities - some of them more relevant today than when Koepp handed in his first-draft screenplay just one year ago (after years of fruitless development, the $135 million production was put together faster than almost any other film of its size and scope).

In one sequence, for instance, Ray tries to stop Robbie from running over a hill to help our military engage the invincible, 200-foot-tall tripods.

``I bet there are some Army recruiters who can relate to that,'' Koepp wryly observes. ``But any time (during the writing stage) I would try to start a political discussion about it, Steven would say, 'Let's get the story and the characters right. If we try to do it backward, if we try to make points, it's going to be turgid and kind of crappy.' I think in that case, we just happened to get parental response right.''

``I was hoping that everybody could see, in this movie, the facet of a prism, as to what they choose to take from 'War of the Worlds,' '' Spielberg says. ``So I tried to make it as open for interpretation as possible without having anybody coming out with political polemics.''

Another restriction Spielberg insisted on: We don't see or know anything that Ray doesn't. While ``WOTW'' certainly has plenty of the destruction contemporary disaster movie fans crave, don't expect to see famous landmarks blasted into oblivion or entire cities vaporized in one wide CGI shot.

``I didn't want to go there. I wanted this to be a cousin of 'Saving Private Ryan,' in a strange way, in the genre of science fiction. It's told from a first-person point of view, and all of the characters had to be as realistic and normal as we are.''

Nevertheless, Spielberg made room for shots as complex as Orson Welles' legendary, minutes-long ``Touch of Evil'' opening sequence - with exploding buildings, flying cars and atomized people thrown in for good measure. But, following the plot line of the novel, the film goes underground at a climactic point for an extended sequence of much more intimate terror.

``We're inside that basement for 20 minutes,'' Cruise marvels. ``To be able to choreograph and sustain that kind of tension ... It's why, when I'm working with different filmmakers, I'll always go back and study Steven's pictures.''

``We knew there were going to be large-scale, terrifying sequences in the earlier half of the movie,'' explains Tim Robbins, whose deranged character Ogilvy offers Ray and Rachel uneasy asylum in a cellar. ``We had to build the same kind of fear and terror in a confined location. It was a matter of knowing that the threat was right outside the door, but also knowing that the threat was right next to you.''

In the end, Spielberg's ``War of the Worlds'' strives to bring the current zeitgeist of fear on an international scale down to the most localized of experiences.

``There's a huge relationship to what's been going on in the world,'' notes Australian actress Otto, who really was pregnant with her first child when she filmed ``WOTW'' early in the year. ``You really can't take anything in life for granted anymore. Whether it was the 9-11 attacks or the tsunami in Asia, we've seen images of people who get up in the morning, and by the afternoon everything they knew in their lives has completely changed.''

Cruise sums it up succinctly: ``I thought that the book was relevant and timeless because it was about people.''

TO WHAT END, THESE PROMOTIONAL ANTICS?

Is this any way to destroy the world? Or, at least, to do it profitably?

Starting in Tokyo nearly two weeks ago, Tom Cruise and Steven Spielberg have been premiering their big, sci-fi blockbuster ``War of the Worlds'' across the globe ... while Cruise's Eiffel Tower proposal to new girlfriend Katie Holmes, assault from squirt gun-wielding pranksters in London and televised pronouncements about Scientology everywhere have kept the tabloids and entertainment news shows buzzing. On Friday morning, he took on Matt Lauer on ``Today.''

American reporters are among the last to see and hear about the end-of- the-world epic, and L.A. will be the last major city in the world to host a red carpet event Monday for the film, a mere two days before it opens worldwide.

It's an unusual way to promote a major motion picture. But probably not a bad one, according to industry observers (Paramount Pictures, which is releasing ``War of the Worlds'' in North America, declined to comment for this article).

``Cruise and Spielberg are two of the planet's biggest stars,'' notes Gitesh Pandya, editor of Boxofficeguru.com. ``And they're doing a film that has the potential to be one of the year's top grossers worldwide. So it makes sense for them to support the film in Japan and Europe.''

Even more so when you consider the fact that Cruise is a bigger star overseas than he is here. His last sci-fi collaboration with Spielberg, ``Minority Report,'' grossed $197 million internationally and $132 million domestically.

``This creates an event for something that, in a very busy marketplace, needs to pop,'' adds David Poland, who runs the Hot Button and Movie City News Web sites for cinema obsessives. ``Nobody else is doing the world tour, and this is raising the stakes in terms of media. We're covering the international tour while it gets the international markets even more excited than it gets us because they're not as jaded. So it probably is a very, very effective strategy. But not everybody can do it. You have to have a Tom Cruise.''

And, apparently, you have to have his love life and spiritual beliefs as a big part of the package, which some pundits think could provoke an audience backlash. Some are even calling the engagement a publicity stunt as Cruise began proclaiming his love for Holmes and asked her to marry him during his publicity tour. She, too, is promoting her new movie, ``Batman Begins.''

``I get excited about living,'' Cruise says by way of explaining his exuberant and confrontational public outbursts of late, jumping on couches on both the ``Oprah'' and ``Tonight'' shows. ``And people. And there are things in my life, Scientology and tools that I've spoken of before, that I apply to my life and have helped me.''

``I think that there are some fans who are being turned off by his antics,'' Pandya reckons. ``Especially sci-fi and male fans who are going to show up for this movie anyway because they love the premise. But even all of this overexposure of the relationship probably won't be enough to keep them from buying tickets. I think the point is to try get in some of the female filmgoers who are not natural sci-fi action fans by using the gossip and tabloid press. That typically attracts a more female audience.''

It certainly worked for ``Mr. & Mrs. Smith.''

``The Katie thing is not an issue,'' Poland states flatly. ``I think all it's done is kept awareness that the movie's coming up for a long time. If the movie's not good, if the movie is marginal, then you're looking at a damage problem. But I don't think it's the kind of thing where you go, 'You know, I was gonna go see ``War of the Worlds,'' I wanted to see all of that stuff blow up. But I don't want to see a Scientologist having sex with a 26-year-old getting squirted in the face. That's real upsetting to me.' I just don't think that people make those kinds of decisions.''

Just how much will ``War of the Worlds'' have to gross domestically to be considered a success?

``If it can do $150 million or more over those six days (Wednesday through the following Monday's July 4 holiday), I think the studio will be ecstatic,'' Pandya estimates. ``If it can't do $100 million, then it's certainly in trouble.''

- B.S.

CAPTION(S):

3 photos, box

Photo:

(1 -- cover -- color) A WAR IN THE MAKING

An intense Steven Spielberg, and explosive Tom Cruise and a story of colliding worlds

(2) no caption (Tom Cruise and Steven Spielberg)

(3) Tom Cruise on the ``Tonight Show''

Box:

TO WHAT END, THESE PROMOTIONAL ANTICS? (see text)