Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,488,142 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Mystery grant: funding government secrecy?


A DAY AFTER the Freedom of Information Act turned 40, USA Today USA Today

National U.S. daily general-interest newspaper, the first of its kind. Launched in 1982 by Allen Neuharth, head of the Gannett newspaper chain, it reached a circulation of one million within a year and surpassed two million in the 1990s.
 reported that Congress had approved a $1 million grant to an obscure law school. Researchers, the paper reported, would spend the cash searching for "ways to restrict public access to sensitive government data through freedom of information laws." The grant to the Center for Terrorism Law at St. Mary's University Law School in San Antonio San Antonio (săn ăntō`nēō, əntōn`), city (1990 pop. 935,933), seat of Bexar co., S central Tex., at the source of the San Antonio River; inc. 1837.  had been tacked to a Defense Department appropriations bill.

Sen. John Cornyn John Cornyn III (born February 2 1952) is the junior United States Senator from Texas. He is a Republican and was elected to his first term in November 2002, defeating Democrat Ron Kirk, the former mayor of Dallas, Texas, and Libertarian Scott Jameson of Plano, Texas.  (R-Texas), a St. Mary's graduate and a vocal supporter of the grant, claims the purpose of the study is the opposite of what the USA Today account indicated. The study is directed not at the federal Freedom of Information Act, he says, but at state laws that limit access to information; it is intended to improve access, not restrict it further. A spokesperson from his office explains, "It's about a balance between national security and information."

Critics, including the American Civil Liberties Union American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), nonpartisan organization devoted to the preservation and extension of the basic rights set forth in the U.S. Constitution.  (ACLU ACLU: see American Civil Liberties Union. ) and the Sunshine in Government Initiative, remain skeptical. One reason is the Center for Terrorism Law's strong military connections: Its director is a career military officer, and consultants include two retired Army major generals, a colonel who is an Army Reservist re·serv·ist  
n.
A member of a military reserve.


reservist
Noun

a member of a nation's military reserve

Noun 1.
, and an active-duty major in the Air Force. "The only civilian consultant," says an ACLU statement, "is a student who is studying to be a librarian."

Beyond a statement characterizing the study as an "independent information gathering initiative" without political affiliation, St. Mary's has refused to comment on the subject of freedom of information. Even if the purpose of the study turns out to be as benign as Cornyn insists, taxpayers will be left with a puzzle: Why is the Defense Department funding a study of state freedom of in formation laws?
COPYRIGHT 2006 Reason Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Congress grant to the Center for Terrorism Law
Author:Howley, Kerry
Publication:Reason
Article Type:Brief article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 1, 2006
Words:296
Previous Article:According to Sasha Alhovsky, eight New York City cops knocked him from his bicycle, put guns to his head and threw him in jail for four...
Next Article:Crime fiction: homeland security quotas.(Citings)(Brief article)
Topics:



Related Articles
NCSL scores major victory in Brady Law case. (National Conference of State Legislatures on Brady Gun Law)(The States' Advocate.)
Crossing the line.(Editorials)(Secret court issues rare rebuke of Ashcroft)(Editorial)
Does secrecy equal security? Limiting access to environmental information.(Spheres of Influence)
Civil liberties in an age of terrorism: safeguarding individual rights while ensuring national security is more difficult now than ever. Litigation...
Patriot Act provision ruled unconstitutional.(News, Trends & Analysis)
Homeland security: who gets what and how.(Statestats)
Government secrecy reaches historic levels.(UP FRONT)
Access to environmental information.(Perspectives / Correspondence)
Advocacy update: charting a course for the future: a new Congress brings new challenges.(Federal grant program to parks and recreation areas)
The color of training money.(EDUCATION AND TRAINING)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles