Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,716,216 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

My advice for John McCain: a long-time Washington political and policy strategist, in an open letter to the likely Republican presidential candidate, offers this advice: Create a New Reagan Majority.


Dear John--

You are a very special conservative Republican with unique populist pop·u·list  
n.
1. A supporter of the rights and power of the people.

2. Populist A supporter of the Populist Party.

adj.
1.
 appeal among independents and Democrats as a straight-talking maverick Maverick

family name of two brothers, Bret and Bait; self-centered and untrustworthy gentlemen gamblers. [TV: Terrace, II, 80]

See : Gambling
. You alone can re-create the broad national Reagan majority. You are in danger of blurring your identity by echoing the fading Bush loyalists Loyalists, in the American Revolution, colonials who adhered to the British cause. The patriots referred to them as Tories. Although Loyalists were found in all social classes and occupations, a disproportionately large number were engaged in commerce and the . After November 2006, election polls indicate that the Republican establishment will be discredited dis·cred·it  
tr.v. dis·cred·it·ed, dis·cred·it·ing, dis·cred·its
1. To damage in reputation; disgrace.

2. To cause to be doubted or distrusted.

3. To refuse to believe.

n.
 by the worst GOP election defeats since the November 1974 post-Watergate wipeout.

You should focus clearly on Ronald Reagan as your model and adopt his 1976-80 outsider's strategy. Direct your message to the likely stay-at-homes, whose non-voting could decide the next two elections. You can mobilize these millions of Republicans, independents, and conservative Democrats In American politics, a Conservative Democrat is a Democratic Party member with conservative political views.

21st century Conservative Democrats are similar to liberal Republican counterparts, in that both became political minorities after their respective political parties
 to support you as a principled prin·ci·pled  
adj.
Based on, marked by, or manifesting principle: a principled decision; a highly principled person.
, consistent conservative who speaks his mind.

But you must give your potential supporters among the turned-off non-voters truly inspired "straight-talk" messages on Iraq, the economy, jobs, and the budget deficits destroying our grandchildren's futures. Tell them why you will be a different kind of president who keeps his promises.

Your opportunity to lead arises from your heroic military service. As a proven warrior, you are regarded as especially qualified by skill, experience and sound judgment to be able to lead us honorably from Iraq. You must validate that faith by your unflinchingly honest assessment of Iraq. Inescapably, Iraq will be your defining, decisive issue in the 2008 campaign.

Like Reagan, you are the feisty outsider untainted by Washington scandals and the record of the past eight years--especially Defense Secretary Donald

Rumsfeld's "war on the cheap" losing strategy in Iraq. Go on the attack against the mistakes you'll correct and share your dreams for the positive changes we can achieve together.

You have shown enough loyalty to Bush, now focus on Reagan as your model and make your messages future-oriented and boldly optimistic op·ti·mist  
n.
1. One who usually expects a favorable outcome.

2. A believer in philosophical optimism.



op
. Emphasize that you carry the libertarian lib·er·tar·i·an  
n.
1. One who advocates maximizing individual rights and minimizing the role of the state.

2. One who believes in free will.



[From liberty.
 banner of Reagan's authentic domestic legacy as a limited-government conservative. You must stay in character, be true to yourself, and say and do nothing that might impair your all-important image of integrity and independence.

You said from the start of the Iraq war Iraq War: see under Persian Gulf Wars.
Iraq War
 or Second Persian Gulf War

Brief conflict in 2003 between Iraq and a combined force of troops largely from the U.S. and Great Britain; and a subsequent U.S.
 that Secretary Rumsfeld was gambling by deploying too few troops. You said: "I have strenuously argued for larger troop numbers in Iraq, including the right kind of troops--linguists, special forces, civil affairs Designated Active and Reserve component forces and units organized, trained, and equipped specifically to conduct civil affairs activities and to support civil-military operations. Also called CA. See also civil affairs activities; civil-military operations. , etc. There are very strong differences of opinion between myself and Secretary Rumsfeld on that issue."

Now is the time to state these differences clearly. Rumsfeld's gamble has failed. In December 2004, you declared that you had "no confidence" in Rumsfeld, but did not then call for his resignation. Now, as the incoming Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee The term Armed Services Committee could refer to:
  • U.S. House Committee on Armed Services
  • U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services
 in 2007, you should declare that you expect to oversee Rumsfeld's retirement. In Iraq, our troops have performed magnificently but they are too few and stretched too thin. They and the nation have been failed by civilian Pentagon officials and Secretary Rumsfeld must accept responsibility.

You must have a realistic plan to achieve our objectives and honorably conclude our military involvement in Iraq. Your plan, based on expert military advice from all ranks, will be presented in the coming national debate on the peaceful future America seeks in the Middle-East and the world.

In human and financial terms, the Iraq intervention, now in its fourth year, is costing Americans much more than anyone ever forecast. A veteran Pentagon budget official, now retired, guesses the cost at one trillion dollars before we ultimately can say "mission accomplished." In the years ahead, America faces unprecedented social, demographic and economic challenges as the "baby boomers See generation X. " turn 65 and qualify for Social Security and Medicare benefits. There can be no more "trillion-dollar surprises" like Iraq in our fiscal and budgetary planning if we are to finance and resolve our problems at home.

Your goal in 2008 is not only to win the presidency but also to create an expanded, enduring new majority of voters who share your confidence in America's future. You would re-create the kind of broad bipartisan coalitions that Reagan mobilized, with presidential coattails coat·tail  
n.
1. The loose back part of a coat that hangs below the waist.

2. coattails The skirts of a formal or dress coat.

Idiom:
on the coattails of
1.
 for Congressional allies whose support is essential to fulfill our country's plans and achieve our dreams.

Reagan believed that vital, dynamic leadership can make all the difference. You can create an expanding and winning New Majority in 21st century America--a truly principled, conservative governing party worthy of our nation's traditions.

By adopting this optimistic, inclusive and expansive Reagan approach, you can be in an extraordinary position on the morning after the November 2006 elections--able to carry out your strategy. As the outsider who speaks his mind, you can be the clear frontrunner, headed toward an historic victory and a powerful mandate in 2008.
COPYRIGHT 2006 International Economy Publications, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Whalen, Richard J.
Publication:The International Economy
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Mar 22, 2006
Words:775
Previous Article:2008 presidential winter book: Washington's most trusted independent political analyst sets the scene.(presidential elections)
Next Article:Washington's potential Mexico problem: the consequences of a left-wing win in July's elections could be greater than financial markets think.
Topics:



Related Articles
Not ready for campaign time: an on-site dispatch from (argh) the 2000 GOP presidential race. (Grand Old Party)
Mixing religion and politics.(GOP presidential hopefuls and the anti-gay religious right)
Trump's Top Op.(Donald Trump's political adviser Roger Stone)
More military maneuvers.(gays in the military)
From W.'s Playbook.(George W. Bush's presidential campaign)
The big switch: why democrats should draft John McCain in '04, and why he should let them.
Perverse polarity: the mainstream media bemoans the lack of civility in Washington--but won't say who's responsible.(political news)
Why not Hillary? She can win the White House.(Hillary Rodham Clinton)
Shades of blue: will the North vote the Democrats back into power?
GOP duel: the primaries get underway, dominated by two men.(Mitt Romney, John McCain)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles