Printer Friendly
The Free Library
5,675,293 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Morales v. Conley.


U.S. District Court

ALIEN

Morales v. Conley, 224 F.Supp.2d 1070 (S.D.W.Va. 2002). A Mariel Cuban inmate sought habeas corpus relief, seeking his release from confinement. The district court dismissed the action, finding that immediate release was not warranted for an inadmissible That which, according to established legal principles, cannot be received into evidence at a trial for consideration by the jury or judge in reaching a determination of the action.  Mariel Cuban who had been adjudged excludable in 1992, and who had received annual reviews pursuant to the Cuban Review Plan. The court held that the continued detention of the inmate was not punishment and therefore did not violate his right to substantive due process The substantive limitations placed on the content or subject matter of state and federal laws by the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. . The court found continued detention necessary because the inmate's repatriation Repatriation

The process of converting a foreign currency into the currency of one's own country.

Notes:
If you are American, converting British Pounds back to U.S. dollars is an example of repatriation.
 to Cuba was not possible and his release would pose a risk to society. (Federal Correctional Institution, Beckley Federal Correctional Institution, Beckley is a medium security facility in Beaver, West Virginia, USA. , West Virginia)
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:HABEAS CORPUS
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U5WV
Date:Feb 1, 2003
Words:122
Previous Article:Gant v. Reilly.(HABEAS CORPUS)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Pearl v. Cason.(HABEAS CORPUS)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: EX POST FACTO.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE EX POST FACTO.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: ALIEN.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
Gant v. Reilly.(HABEAS CORPUS)(Brief Article)
Rasul v. Bush.(HABEAS CORPUS)(Brief Article)
Rasul v. Bush.(habeas corpus petition)(Brief Article)
Gant v. Reilly.(cases of habeas corpus)(Brief Article)
Rasul v. Bush.(habeas corpus cases)(Brief Article)
Singleton v. Norris.(habeas corpus petition)(Brief Article)
Habeas corpus.(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles