Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,735,279 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Montez Estate of Hearlson v. U.S.


U.S. Appeals Court

FTCA FTCA Federal Tort Claims Act
FTCA Federal Trade Commission Act
FTCA French Central Technical Armament Establishment
 -- Federal Tort Claims Act Enacted in 1946 the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) (60 Stat. 842) removed the inherent Immunity of the federal government from most tort actions brought against it and established the conditions for the commencement of such suits.  

Montez Estate of Hearlson v. U.S., 359 F.3d 392 (6th Cir. 2004). The administratrix ADMINISTRATRIX. This term is applied to a woman to whom letters of administration have been granted. See Administrator.  of the estate of a murdered federal inmate brought a negligence claim against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). The district court dismissed the case and the administratrix appealed. The appeals court affirmed. The appeals court that the allegations in the complaint were insufficient to rebut To defeat, dispute, or remove the effect of the other side's facts or arguments in a particular case or controversy.

When a defendant in a lawsuit proves that the plaintiff's allegations are not true, the defendant has thereby rebutted them.


TO REBUT.
 the presumption that prison officials' decisions regarding the inmate's safety at the time of his death were of the type that could be said to be grounded in Bureau of Prisons (BOP) policy, and thus the FTCA's discretionary function exception shielded the United States from liability for the inmate's death. The court noted that applicable statutes and regulations gave the BOP discretion in deciding how to accomplish its stated objectives and to decide when disciplinary action is necessary. (Federal Medical Center, Lexington The Federal Medical Center, Lexington is a federal prison in Lexington, Kentucky housing 1,447 male inmates at a high security camp and 283 female inmates at a low security camp. History
The site opened on May 15 1935 on 1,000 acres under the name "U.S.
, Kentucky)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:negligence
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U6KY
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:158
Previous Article:Davis v. Hall.(due process violations)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Phiffer v. Columbia River Correctional Inst.(violation of Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and Rehabilitation Act of 1973)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: FAILURE TO TRAIN.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: SUICIDE NEGLIGENCE.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: SUICIDE.(Brief Article)
Duke Suit. (Up Front).(Doris Duke Charitable Foundation sues Katten Muchin Zavis)(Brief Article)
Cook Ex Rel. Tessier v. Sheriff of Monroe County.(respondeat superior, prisoner suicide case)(Brief Article)
Estate of Allen v. City of Rockford.(violation of due process)(Brief Article)
Estate of Allen v. City of Rockford.(violation of due process of law)(Brief Article)
Montez Estate of Hearlson v. U.S.(cases of negligence)(Brief Article)
Classification & separation.
Cruel and unusual punishment.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles