Mmmm, that's crunchy.Analysis of isotopes An isotope a type of neutral atom but the number of neutrons is different from the number of protons in the nucleus. May be radioactive. Elements 1-15 Hydrogen
An informal or slang term for pubic lice. Mentioned in: Lice Infestation crabs Pubic lice, see there and snails. The eating habits of ancient hominids known as robust australopithecines have been a matter of debate for decades. These creatures, which are typically lumped into the genus Paranthropus Noun 1. genus Paranthropus - former classification for Australopithecus robustus Paranthropus australopithecine - any of several extinct humanlike bipedal primates with relatively small brains of the genus Australopithecus; from 1 to 4 million years ago , roamed the African landscape side by side with human ancestors Ancestors See also father; heredity; mother; origins; parents; race. archaism an inclination toward old-fashioned things, speech, or actions, especially those of one’s ancestors. Also archaicism. — archaist, n. for more than 1 million years--a sign that the two lineages were exploiting different resources, says Alan B. Shabel of the University of California, Berkeley The University of California, Berkeley is a public research university located in Berkeley, California, United States. Commonly referred to as UC Berkeley, Berkeley and Cal . Researchers previously suggested that the two lineages could coexist co·ex·ist intr.v. co·ex·ist·ed, co·ex·ist·ing, co·ex·ists 1. To exist together, at the same time, or in the same place. 2. because early Homo species were increasingly eating meat, while robust australopithecines were vegetarians. The teeth of the latter creatures were apparently well suited for chewing plant material. Their molars had a cross section the size of a nickel, about four times the size of modern human molars, says Shabel. Various scientists have speculated that the teeth enabled robust australopithecines to eat tough foods, such as nuts, hard fruits, and the seeds of grasses. Later research showed that the ratio of carbon isotopes in the creatures' teeth falls between that found in seed-eating animals and that found in fruit-and-nut eaters. That led some scientists to conjecture CONJECTURE. Conjectures are ideas or notions founded on probabilities without any demonstration of their truth. Mascardus has defined conjecture: "rationable vestigium latentis veritatis, unde nascitur opinio sapientis;" or a slight degree of credence arising from evidence too weak or too that Paranthropus had a varied vegetarian diet. But there may be another explanation, says Shabel. Wetland ecosystems were common in Africa between 2.5 million and 1.5 million years ago, when robust australopithecines thrived. Those regions would have been rich in freshwater crabs and large snails, just as they are today, says Shabel. When he measured the carbon-isotope ratios in the teeth of modern African predators that prefer such shelled prey, he found that those ratios are in the range of that of Paranthropus. A diet of wetland prey would explain why robust australopithecines needed large molars. Even if the creatures used tools to crush their prey, they'd have required robust teeth to chew shell-ridden morsels. Future analyses, such as comparisons of the tooth-wear patterns in robust australopithecines with those of modern shell eaters, such as mongooses, may bolster the notion that Paranthropus had a taste for shelled invertebrates long before modern humans developed small wooden hammers and crab picks. |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion