Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,551,639 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Mercy Medical Center, Cedar Rapids, IA, June 14 (Kansas City, KS).


After a March 11 inspection, FDA FDA
abbr.
Food and Drug Administration


FDA,
n.pr See Food and Drug Administration.

FDA,
n.pr the abbreviation for the Food and Drug Administration.
 inspectors found several violations in the blood bank's donor screening process.

Violations included failure to follow the center's standard operating procedure standard operating procedure Medtalk A technique, method or therapy performed 'by the book,' using a standard protocol meeting internally or externally defined criteria; a formal, written procedure that describes how specific lab operations are to be performed.  (SOP), failure to make and record a thorough investigation, conclusion and follow-up of any unexplained unexplained
Adjective

strange or unclear because the reason for it is not known

Adj. 1. unexplained - not explained; "accomplished by some unexplained process"
 discrepancies; and failure to provide adequate space for private and accurate examinations for potential donors.

For example, the SOP required the center to complete health history screening and defer a donor when certain health history information was provided.

The agency stated the center, nevertheless, accepted numerous donors whose health screenings were incomplete or contained potentially disqualifying dis·qual·i·fy  
tr.v. dis·qual·i·fied, dis·qual·i·fy·ing, dis·qual·i·fies
1.
a. To render unqualified or unfit.

b. To declare unqualified or ineligible.

2.
 in formation. For example, several donors had stated they had traveled outside of the U.S., yet Mercy accepted the donors without determining whether the travel was to areas that represented a high risk of infection.

Furthermore, donor cards donor card
n.
A card, usually carried on one's person, authorizing the use of one's bodily organs for transplantation in the event of one's death.
 contained unanswered questions and quality review procedures had not been completed.

The agency acknowledged receipt of the center's April 4 response, but deemed it inadequate because it did not address all of the observations listed. BiMo, QC/QS; Doc. 13531W
COPYRIGHT 2005 Washington Information Source, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:BLOOD/BIOLOGICAL DEVICES
Publication:Warning Letter Bulletin
Date:Jul 1, 2005
Words:177
Previous Article:MedImmune Vaccines, Gaithersburg, MD, June 21 (CBER).(BLOOD/BIOLOGICAL DEVICES)
Next Article:Ovation Pharmaceuticals, Deerfield, IL, June 2 (CBER).(BLOOD/BIOLOGICAL DEVICES)
Topics:



Related Articles
OXYGEN.
Iowa Farmer Today Publications, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, introduces American Acreage, a new monthly magazine aimed at the growing number of people living...
Jefferson Davis Associates Inc. (Agency People).(Brief Article)
Blood/biologics.
Baltimore blood bank cited in 5-item 483 for Part 11 flaws, inadequate process control procedures.(Biologics)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles