Printer Friendly
The Free Library
18,914,692 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Mercury is fishy business.


Your September/October 2004 cover story includes recommendations for women to be smart consumers and prevent environmental illness. But I'm disappointed in your suggestion that women should "limit canned tuna."

Actually, according to information recently published by the Natural Resources Defense Council The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is a New York City-based, non-profit non-partisan international environmental advocacy group, with offices in Washington, D.C., San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Beijing. Founded in 1970, NRDC today has 1. , the fish with the highest levels of mercury, and which should be avoided, include tilefish tilefish, common name for a superior and brilliantly colored food fish of temperate and tropical waters, marked by fleshy flaps on the top of the head and at the corners of the mouth. It is a bottom feeder reaching 3 ft (91 cm) in length and 35 lb (15.8 kg) in weight. , swordfish, shark and king mackerel. The group recommends that fish with the next highest amount of mercury, such as grouper grouper, common name for a large carnivorous member of the family Serranidae (sea bass family), abundant in tropical and subtropical seas and highly valued as food fish. , should be limited to no more than two six-ounce servings per month. At the next level, which is recommended at no more than one six-ounce serving per week, is listed orange roughy, marlin, canned white albacore albacore: see tuna.
albacore

Large oceanic tuna (Thunnus alalunga) that is noted for its fine flesh. The streamlined bodies of these voracious predators are adapted to fast and continuous swimming.
 tuna, sea trout sea trout: see croaker. , fresh tuna, blue fish and lobster. When it comes to "about two six-ounce servings per week, you'll find canned chunk light tuna along with fish such as crab, snapper, herring, halibut and others.

My point is, telling someone to limit canned tuna (notice fresh is no different and, by the way, neither is tuna packaged in a non-recyclable pouch) may mislead an individual into making the wrong choices. A more complete and accurate list of what a smart consumer should do is provided in the story available through the following link: www.nrdc.org/health/eff ects/mercury/guide.asp.

However, I couldn't be more supportive of your recommendation to "Use iron, glass or stainless-steel pans instead of aluminum or nonstick non·stick  
adj.
Permitting easy removal of adherent food particles: a frying pan with a nonstick surface.


nonstick
Adjective
 types."

Bill Heenan, President

Steel Recycling Institute

via e-mail
COPYRIGHT 2005 Earth Action Network, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Advice & dissent: letters from our readers
Author:Heenan, Bill
Publication:E
Article Type:Letter to the Editor
Date:Jan 1, 2005
Words:246
Previous Article:Standing against animal testing.(Letter to the Editor)
Next Article:Vegan dining?(Letter to the Editor)



Related Articles
ADVICE & DISSENT.(Letter to the Editor)
Fired up over prairie dogs.(Advice & dissent: letters from our readers)(Letter to the Editor)
Speaking for the animals.(Advice & dissent: letters from our readers)(Letter to the Editor)
Raw food reality.(Advice & dissent: letters from our readers)(Letter to the Editor)
Pinpointing acupuncture.(Advice & dissent: letters from our readers)(Letter to the Editor)
A pilot's perspective.(Advice & dissent: letters from our readers)(Letter to the Editor)
Wind and politicians.(ADVICE & DISSENT: Letters from our readers)(Letter to the Editor)
What about wind towers?(ADVICE & DISSENT: Letters from our readers)(Letter to the Editor)
Show them the money.(ADVICE & DISSENT: Letters from our readers)(Letter to the Editor)
Oily business.(ADVICE & DISSENT: Letters from our readers)(Letter to the editor)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles