Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,735,255 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Media tilt.


Live appearances by George W. Bush received 12 hours and 11 minutes of cable news coverage, compared to three hours and 47 minutes for Kerry between March 3 and April 16, reports The Washington Post's Howard Kurtz Howard Alan Kurtz (born 1 August 1953 in Brooklyn, New York [1]) is an American journalist, , author and media writer for the Washington Post.

Kurtz is the host of CNN's Reliable Sources and has written for The New Republic, the
. Part of this, of course, was due to Kerry's absences from the campaign because of his bad shoulder. But even after making the most generous allowance for Kerry's days off, Bush clearly had an advantage of more than 2-to-l. Bush's coverage was also, in my view, unmistakably un·mis·tak·a·ble  
adj.
Impossible to mistake or misinterpret; obvious: unmistakable signs of illness.



un
 more respectful re·spect·ful  
adj.
Showing or marked by proper respect.



re·spectful·ly adv.
 than Kerry received, especially on FOX and CNN's Headline News. It is perhaps no coincidence Coincidence is the noteworthy alignment of two or more events or circumstances without obvious causal connection. The word is derived from the Latin co- ("in", "with", "together") and incidere ("to fall on").  the same period this study covered, the presidential race according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 Gallup has gone from a Kerry lead to a Bush lead, 51-46.

The historic ability of the White House to control the news tended to disappear during the Clinton years but returned full-blast on 9/11. Since then, Bush has gotten the full benefit of the commander-in-chief role. The only exception to the recent White House dominance was during this year's Democratic primaries, which may help explain why as Kerry clinched the nomination, he led Bush in the polls by a comfortable margin.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Washington Monthly Company
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Tilting at Windmills
Author:Peters, Charles
Publication:Washington Monthly
Date:May 1, 2004
Words:195
Previous Article:Gravy jet.(Tilting at Windmills)
Next Article:Republican judge.(Tilting at Windmills)



Related Articles
Welcome to Hooverville. (Letters).
Marrying Mohammed Atta. (Letters).
Enron 101. (Letters).(Letter to the Editor)
Corrections.
Feeding frenzy. (Letters).(Letter to the Editor)
Cracks in the foundation.(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)
Jilting at windmills.(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)
What liberal media?(Tilting at Windmills)
Who's Bad?(Letter to the Editor)
In defense of Wal-Mart.(LETTERS)(Letter to the editor)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles