Measuring up: examining the need to establish state-based biomonitoring Programs.* How should the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. begin to address human exposures to environmental chemicals? * And how should we interpret what those exposures mean in terms of human health? * A means of addressing these environmental health quandaries is the laboratory-based tool called human biomonitoring. * Biomonitoring measures levels of chemicals or their metabolites Metabolites Substances produced by metabolism or by a metabolic process. Mentioned in: Interactions in samples of blood, urine, saliva, breast milk, and tissues such as hair. * To date, the primary focus at the state level has been prevention of childhood lead poisoning lead poisoning or plumbism (plŭm`bĭz'əm), intoxication of the system by organic compounds containing lead. . * The time has come to expand beyond lead programs and to begin monitoring for new and emerging hazards. * The Association of Public Health Laboratories The Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) works to safeguard the public's health by strengthening government laboratories with a public health mandate in the United States and across the world. and the NCEH NCEH National Center for Environmental Health (US CDC) Division of Laboratory Sciences have launched the State Public Health Laboratory Biomonitoring Planning and Implementation Grant Program. * The purpose is to build biomonitoring capacity at state public health laboratories. * The program has distributed $5 million to 25 applicants (covering 33 states), several of which represented multistate mul·ti·state adj. Of, relating to, or involving several states: a multistate environmental campaign. consortia. * The grants gave most states the funding needed to plan biomonitoring programs. * Additional resources are needed if those states are to implement and sustain their plans. * The amount of federal funding being made available to these states continues to decline, however. * Finding money for states without biomonitoring programs is even more critical. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion