Printer Friendly
The Free Library
21,446,311 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

McRoy v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections.

U.S. District Court

STRIP SEARCH

McRoy v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections, 366 F.Supp.2d 662 (N.D.Ill. 2005). A Muslim inmate INMATE. One who dwells in a part of another's house, the latter dwelling, at the same time, in the said house. Kitch. 45, b; Com. Dig. Justices of the Peace, B 85; 1 B. & Cr. 578; 8 E. C. L. R. 153; 2 Dowl. & Ry. 743; 8 B. & Cr. 71; 15 E. C. L. R. 154; 2 Man. & Ry. 227; 9 B. & Cr.  at a county correctional facility brought a civil rights action under [section] 1983, alleging that his opportunities to practice his faith were restricted in violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment The Free Exercise Clause is the accompanying clause with the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights (part of the Constitution). As it states in full: . The district court granted summary judgment in favor of upon the side of; favorable to; for the advantage of.

See also: favor
 the defendants. The court also found no violation in the policy of strip-searching inmates when they were leaving or returning to an inmate area, noting that the inmate could choose not to attend a service because of the policy and could pray in his cell or common area instead. (Cook County Department of Corrections, Illinois Illinois, river, United States
Illinois, river, 273 mi (439 km) long, formed by the confluence of the Des Plaines and Kankakee rivers, NE Ill., and flowing SW to the Mississippi at Grafton, Ill. It is an important commercial and recreational waterway.
)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:SEARCHES
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Words:123
Previous Article:Lashley v. Wakefield.
Next Article:Thomsen v. Ross.
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. District Court: PRIVACY SEARCHES.
No Comment.
Personnel.
Sentence.
Pierce v. Ohio Dept. of Rehabilitation and Corr.
Hightower v. Nassau County Sheriff's Dept.
Liles v. Camden County Dept. of Corrections.
McRoy v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections.
McRoy v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections.
McRoy v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2013 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles