Printer Friendly
The Free Library
21,419,978 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

McRoy v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections.

U.S. District Court

RELIGIOUS SERVICES

SEARCHES

McRoy v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections, 366 F.Supp.2d 662 (N.D.Ill. 2005). A Muslim inmate INMATE. One who dwells in a part of another's house, the latter dwelling, at the same time, in the said house. Kitch. 45, b; Com. Dig. Justices of the Peace, B 85; 1 B. & Cr. 578; 8 E. C. L. R. 153; 2 Dowl. & Ry. 743; 8 B. & Cr. 71; 15 E. C. L. R. 154; 2 Man. & Ry. 227; 9 B. & Cr.  at a county correctional facility brought a civil rights action under [section] 1983, alleging that his opportunities to practice his faith were restricted in violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment The Free Exercise Clause is the accompanying clause with the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights (part of the Constitution). As it states in full: . The district court granted summary judgment in favor of upon the side of; favorable to; for the advantage of.

See also: favor
 the defendants. The court held that the inmate's free exercise rights were not violated vi·o·late  
tr.v. vi·o·lat·ed, vi·o·lat·ing, vi·o·lates
1. To break or disregard (a law or promise, for example).

2. To assault (a person) sexually.

3.
 by the cancellation of Muslim services during lockdowns, staff shortages, and when no volunteer imams were available to preside pre·side  
intr.v. pre·sid·ed, pre·sid·ing, pre·sides
1. To hold the position of authority; act as chairperson or president.

2. To possess or exercise authority or control.

3.
 over services. The court noted that inmates should not be granted authority as religious leaders over other inmates, and cancellation of services when volunteer imams were not available was warranted. The court found that the policy of limiting the number of Muslim services to three each week did not violate the inmate's free exercise rights, nor was a policy that limited the number of inmates who could attend Muslim services at the same time. The court also found no violation in the policy of strip-searching inmates when they were leaving or returning to an inmate area, noting that the inmate could choose not to attend a service because of the policy and could pray in his cell or common area instead. The court upheld the facility's decision not to create a Muslim-only living unit. The court noted that the inmate was permitted to pray in his cell using religious materials he was allowed to keep there, as well as being allowed to pray in the common area of his living unit. (Cook County Department of Corrections, Illinois Illinois, river, United States
Illinois, river, 273 mi (439 km) long, formed by the confluence of the Des Plaines and Kankakee rivers, NE Ill., and flowing SW to the Mississippi at Grafton, Ill. It is an important commercial and recreational waterway.
)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:SAFETY AND SECURITY; violation of prisoners' rights
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U3IL
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Words:279
Previous Article:Willson v. Buss.
Next Article:Lay v. Porker.
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. district court: officer on prisoner assault.
Boyce v. Moore.
Ferrington v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections.
Abney v. Alameida.
Hightower v. Nassau County Sheriff's Dept.
Shakur v. Selsky.
Gates v. Cook.
Failure to protect.
Fitzgerald v. Corrections Corp. of America.
McRoy v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2013 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles