Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,467,272 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Mass. ban on C&D material to be implemented.


The long-awaited Massachusetts ban on disposal, or transfer for disposal, of specific construction and demolition materials will most likely take place in mid-2006. The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP DEP - Deposit
DEP - Deputy
DEP - Data Encryption Processor
DEP - Data Entry Panel
DEP - Data Execution Prevention (computer security)
DEP - Deaf Empowerment Program
DEP - Defense Enterprise Program
DEP - Deflection Error Probable
DEP - Delayed Enlistment/Entry Program (US DoD)
DEP - Department of Environmental Protection
DEP - Departure
DEP - Dependent
DEP - deployed (US DoD)
DEP - Deposition
DEP - Depot
) has released the final version of the rules, which are scheduled to take effect nine months from the date of their promulgation.

The wording of the ban, which will require all asphalt pavement, brick, concrete, wood, metals and OCC from construction and demolition activities to be diverted from disposal and pass through a recycling center, is generally the same as the final version worked out by the DEP and various stakeholders
Stakeholders
All parties that have an interest, financial or otherwise, in a firm-stockholders, creditors, bondholders, employees, customers, management, the community, and the government.
Stakeholder
One who has a share or an interest in an enterprise.

Notes:
Stakeholders in a company may include shareholders, directors, management, suppliers, government, employees, and the community.
See also: Board of Directors, CEO, Corporate Governance, Stockholder
 in the issue, according to Ed Coletta, spokesperson for DEE Those stakeholders included regulators, haulers, recyclers, environmental groups, architects/engineers, contractors, landfill owners, transfer station owners, trade associations, building owners, consultant, law firms and municipalities.

"We worked with so many stakeholders to develop a program that everyone could live with," says Coletta. "We tried to listen to all the groups to address all the concerns."

The stakeholders have participated in numerous DEP C&D Subcommittee meetings since 2001 and recommended to the DEP a phase-in ban on the disposal of asphalt pavement, brick, concrete, metal and wood. One of the factors in targeting these specific materials was a determination that recycling and reuse markets exist for each of them, according to James McQuade, regional planner for DEP who oversaw the development of the ban. He added that since the C&D Subcommittee's recommendation to ban the disposal of these materials, several businesses have expressed interest in establishing additional facilities to recycle and/or reuse these materials, further enhancing the recycling and reuse markets.

"The challenge will be in adding additional C&D materials, such as gypsum wallboard, asphalt shingles, carpet and ceiling tiles, in the future," says McQuade. "It is anticipated the C&D reuse and recycling market infrastructure for these materials will be enhanced as the C&D Subcommittee and other stakeholders continue to divert more C&D material from disposal, allowing Massachusetts to reach its Solid Waste Master Plan goal of 88 percent non-municipal solid waste reduction in 2010."

William Turley, executive director of the Construction Materials Recycling Association (CMRA), says, "The DEP is to be applauded on two fronts here; first, for including industry in the development of the ban. So many states make regulations like this unilaterally without industry input, before getting all the facts. Second, this will promote C&D recycling in a state that has a solid infrastructure to make sure this ban works."

Many other states have expressed an interest in how the DEP developed the ban and in doing something similar in their areas. But, Turley says, New England in general and Massachusetts in particular are fortunate to have the C&D recycling plants there to process the materials into products.
COPYRIGHT 2005 G.I.E. Media, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Commodities
Publication:Construction & Demolition Recycling
Date:Nov 1, 2005
Words:470
Previous Article:A mammoth undertaking.(disaster debris clean up )
Next Article:Demand for gypsum products to increase.(Demand for gypsum products )(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Canada studies mercury, electronics recycling. (Municipal Recycling).(Canadian Association of Recycling Industries)(Brief Article)
Seattle makes recycling mandatory.(Municipal Recycling)(Brief Article)
The power of cooperation.(Editor's Focus)(New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services)
Delaware considers mandatory recycling.(Municipal Recycling)(Brief Article)
States grapple with growing pile of electronic waste.(Columns)(Column)
State of the union: the CMRA provides an update on current C&D legislation in six states.(Regulatory Update)
State of the industry: Construction and Demolition Recycling examines four of the most pressing issues facing the C&D industry.(State of the...
Theory of evolution: New England Recycling evolves to match an increasingly sophisticated mixed C&D recycling industry.(Cover story)
Recycle your cardboard--or else!(COMMODITIES)
Front page news: a MRF retrofit in Iowa produces more ONP for City Carton Recycling Inc.(MRF SERIES)(Company overview)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles