Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,474,247 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Maryland sidesteps Electoral College


Maryland officially became the first state on Tuesday to approve a plan to give its electoral votes for president to the winner of the national popular vote instead of the candidate chosen by state voters.

Gov. Martin O'Malley, a Democrat, signed the measure into law, one day after the state's General Assembly adjourned.

The measure would award Maryland's 10 electoral votes to the national popular vote winner. The plan would only take effect if states representing a majority of the nation's 538 electoral votes decided to make the same change.

State Sen. Jamie Raskin, a law professor and sponsor of the idea, said Maryland is largely ignored by presidential candidates during campaigns, because they assume the Democratic state will vote for the Democratic candidate.

Raskin, a Democrat, said he hoped Maryland's support for the idea will start a national discussion and "kick off an insurrection among spectator states _ the states that are completely bypassed and sidelined" during presidential campaigns.

"Going by the national popular vote will reawaken politics in every part of the country," Raskin said.

Other states are considering the change to avoid an election in which a candidate wins the national popular vote but loses in the Electoral College, as in 2000 when Democrat Al Gore lost to George W. Bush.

Hawaii's legislature recently passed a similar measure, sending it to Republican Gov. Linda Lingle. California lawmakers adopted the measure last year, but Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed it.

National Popular Vote, a group that supports the change, said there are legislative sponsors for the idea in 47 states. Ryan O'Donnell, a spokesman for the group, described O'Malley's decision to sign the legislation as "an open invitation" for other states to join Maryland.

But not everyone is buying into the idea. North Dakota and Montana rejected it earlier this year. Opponents say the change would hurt small rural states, where the percentage of the national vote would be even smaller than the three electoral votes they each have in the overall Electoral College.

Under the current Electoral College system, voters decide to support slates of "electors," who meet to choose the president. A candidate needs a majority of 270 out of 538 to be elected.

___

On the Net:

National Popular Vote: http://www.nationalpopularvote.com

Copyright 2007 AP News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright (c) Mochila, Inc.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:BRIAN WITTE
Publication:AP News
Date:Apr 10, 2007
Words:376
Previous Article:Serbia leader says no independent Kosovo
Next Article:Kerry, Gingrich debate global warming



Related Articles
PRESIDENT HOLDS BIG LEAD ON LABOR DAY.(NEWS)
Colorado's folly.(Editorials)(Plan makes Electoral College system worse)(Editorial)
Wrong route to reform.(Editorials)(Don't bind Oregon electors to national results)(Editorial)
Should the electoral college be changed?(TRENDS AND TRANSITIONS)
Make every vote count: a national popular vote would make sure no state is disadvantaged and every vote is equal.(PRO)
College hijinks? How a simple change in the way California allots its Electoral College votes could determine the outcome of the 2008...
Md. approves Electoral College change
Calif. Senate OKs electoral compact
NJ nears undermining Electoral College
Governor signs popular N.J. vote measure

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles