Martin v. New York Dept. of Correctional Services.U.S. District Court SEX DISCRIMINATION TITLE VII UNION RETALIATION Martin v. New York New York, state, United States New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of Dept. of Correctional Services, 224 F.Supp.3d 434 (N.D.N.Y. 2002). A male employee of a state corrections department, who was a homosexual, sued the department, employee union, and coworkers. The employee alleged sexual discrimination, retaliation, violation of equal protection and breach of duty of fair representation The duty of fair representation is the obligation, incumbent upon U.S. labor unions that are the exclusive bargaining representative of workers in a particular group, to represent all those employees fairly, in good faith, and without discrimination. . The employee described an incident in which two coworkers handcuffed him to the arsenal window during a shift change so that most of the officers leaving the facility could see that he was handcuffed to the window. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The court held that Title VII prohibits sexual harassment sexual harassment, in law, verbal or physical behavior of a sexual nature, aimed at a particular person or group of people, especially in the workplace or in academic or other institutional settings, that is actionable, as in tort or under equal-opportunity statutes. between men and women as well as same-sex sexual harassment, but for the purposes of Title VII "sex" means gender, and harassment on the basis of sexual orientation is not actionable. The court found that the employee failed to demonstrate that the harassment he endured was based on his non-conformity with gender norms instead of his orientation. The court held that the union fulfilled its duty of fair representation with respect to the grievances filed by the employee, and that the alleged conduct of shop stewards who refused to draft and file grievances could not be imputed Attributed vicariously. In the legal sense, the term imputed is used to describe an action, fact, or quality, the knowledge of which is charged to an individual based upon the actions of another for whom the individual is responsible rather than on the individual's to the union council. (Coxsackie Correctional Facility Coxsackie Correctional Facility is a maximum security prison in New York in the USA. The prison is in the Town of Coxsackie in Greene County, New York. Location Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Box 200, Coxsackie, New York 12051-0200 , New York) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion