Printer Friendly
The Free Library
5,676,231 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Marquez v. Gutierrez.


U.S. Appeals Court

EXCESSIVE FORCE

Marquez v. Gutierrez, 322 F.3d 689 (9th Cir. 2003). A state prison inmate INMATE. One who dwells in a part of another's house, the latter dwelling, at the same time, in the said house. Kitch. 45, b; Com. Dig. Justices of the Peace, B 85; 1 B. & Cr. 578; 8 E. C. L. R. 153; 2 Dowl. & Ry. 743; 8 B. & Cr. 71; 15 E. C. L. R. 154; 2 Man. & Ry. 227; 9 B. & Cr.  brought a [section] 1983 action alleging that an officer's act of shooting him during an assault on another inmate constituted use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The district court denied summary judgment for the officer and the officer appealed. The appeals court reversed, finding that the corrections officer The examples and perspective in this article or section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject.
Please [ improve this article] or discuss the issue on the talk page.
 was entitled to qualified immunity Qualified immunity is a doctrine in United States law providing immunity from suit to government officials performing discretionary functions when their action did not violate clearly established law. Qualified immunity was created by the U.S. . The court found that a reasonable officer could have believed that shooting one inmate in the leg to stop an assault that could have seriously injured in·jure  
tr.v. in·jured, in·jur·ing, in·jures
1. To cause physical harm to; hurt.

2. To cause damage to; impair.

3.
 or killed another inmate was a good faith effort to restore order, and was therefore lawful. (California State Prison--Sacramento)
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Aug 1, 2003
Words:122
Previous Article:Bane v. Virginia Dept. of Corrections.(violation of Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Franklin v. Fox.(prison visits)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Ali v. District of Columbia.(violation of United States Constitution. 11th Amendment)
Terry Ex Rel. Terry v. Hill.(PRETRIAL DETENTION)(Brief Article)
Wever v. Lincoln County, Nebraska.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Davis v. Hall.(FALSE IMPRISONMENT/ARREST)(violation of United States Constitution. 14th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Davis v. Hall.(due process violations)(Brief Article)
Davis v. Hall.(violation of due process of law)(Brief Article)
Lewis v. Washington.(prisoners alleges violation of their constitutional rights )(Brief Article)
Lewis v. Washington.(class action lawsuits)(Brief Article)
Lewis v. Washington.(RELIGION)(Brief Article)
Habeas corpus.(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles