MISSOURI'S 10-YEAR TIME LIMIT APPLIED TO ERISA CLAIMS.Missouri's unusually long 10-year statute of limitations A type of federal or state law that restricts the time within which legal proceedings may be brought. Statutes of limitations, which date back to early Roman Law, are a fundamental part of European and U.S. law. applies to claims filed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq. (1974), is a federal law that sets minimum standards for most voluntarily established Pension and health plans in private industry to provide protection for individuals enrolled in these plans. against a self-funded employee benefits plan, the Eight U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Feb. 6. Writing for the three-member panel in Harris Harris, Scotland: see Lewis and Harris. v. The Epoch Group et al. (03-2006), Judge Kermit E. Bye said it was bound by a 1991 Eighth Circuit precedent in Johnson v. State Mutual Life Assurance saying the applicable Missouri Missouri, state, United States Missouri (mĭz r`ē, –ə), one of the midwestern states of the United States. statute was the one with a 10-year time limit.
Plaintiff Jerry Harris fell from a tree, breaking his foot and leg, in 1994. He made a claim for benefits under a self-funded established by his wife's employer, a hospital, and governed gov·ern v. gov·erned, gov·ern·ing, gov·erns v.tr. 1. To make and administer the public policy and affairs of; exercise sovereign authority in. 2. by ERISA See Employee Retirement Income Security Act. ERISA See Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). . The plan denied his claim in 1995, but he didn't file suit until 2002. The defendants removed the case to federal court and moved to dismiss it as time-barred. The plan's language said any action had to be brought within three years "or such longer period as required by applicable state laws." A federal judge ruled Harris's claim was time-barred by federal common law. Harris appealed and prevailed. "Nothing in the federal common law prohibits an ERISA plan from contractually incorporating a state statute of limitations period," Judge Bye wrote. "Neither is this a matter of federal law preempting state law. Instead, this is simply a matter of straightforward contract interpretation." |
|
||||||||||||||

r`ē, –ə)
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion