Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,709,470 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

MISSOURI'S 10-YEAR TIME LIMIT APPLIED TO ERISA CLAIMS.


Missouri's unusually long 10-year statute of limitations A type of federal or state law that restricts the time within which legal proceedings may be brought.

Statutes of limitations, which date back to early Roman Law, are a fundamental part of European and U.S. law.
 applies to claims filed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq. (1974), is a federal law that sets minimum standards for most voluntarily established Pension and health plans in private industry to provide protection for individuals enrolled in these plans.  against a self-funded employee benefits plan, the Eight U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Feb. 6.

Writing for the three-member panel in Harris Harris, Scotland: see Lewis and Harris.  v. The Epoch Group et al. (03-2006), Judge Kermit E. Bye said it was bound by a 1991 Eighth Circuit precedent in Johnson v. State Mutual Life Assurance saying the applicable Missouri Missouri, state, United States
Missouri (mĭzr`ē, –ə), one of the midwestern states of the United States.
 statute was the one with a 10-year time limit.

Plaintiff Jerry Harris fell from a tree, breaking his foot and leg, in 1994. He made a claim for benefits under a self-funded established by his wife's employer, a hospital, and governed gov·ern  
v. gov·erned, gov·ern·ing, gov·erns

v.tr.
1. To make and administer the public policy and affairs of; exercise sovereign authority in.

2.
 by ERISA See Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

ERISA

See Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
. The plan denied his claim in 1995, but he didn't file suit until 2002.

The defendants removed the case to federal court and moved to dismiss it as time-barred.

The plan's language said any action had to be brought within three years "or such longer period as required by applicable state laws."

A federal judge ruled Harris's claim was time-barred by federal common law. Harris appealed and prevailed.

"Nothing in the federal common law prohibits an ERISA plan from contractually incorporating a state statute of limitations period," Judge Bye wrote.

"Neither is this a matter of federal law preempting state law. Instead, this is simply a matter of straightforward contract interpretation."
COPYRIGHT 2004 JR Publishing, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Liability & Insurance Week
Date:Feb 17, 2004
Words:228
Previous Article:MINNESOTA MAN'S DEATH WHILE DRUNK DEFINED AS ACCIDENTAL.
Next Article:SD AND WV SUED BY COUNCIL OVER THEIR COUNTER-SIGNATURE LAWS.
Topics:



Related Articles
Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993; Voluntary Compliance Resolution program; fiduciary responsibilities; distribution rules; excise taxes. (Current...
Broken promises, lost benefits: holding employers to their word. (includes related article on ERISA preemption) (Proof of Damages)
ERISA and the loss of just remedies.(Employment Law)
Current developments in employee benefits. (part 2)
ERISA preemption: denying employees' rights to benefits.
Insurers must detail conferral of discretion in ERISA benefits cases.
DOL investigation highlights risks and rewards of employers' recouping benefit plan costs.(Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
TEXAS: EMPLOYERS CASUALTY EMPLOYEES LOSE ERISA CLAIM.
Safe harbor excludes HSAs from ERISA.(health savings accounts)
Do you need fiduciary liability insurance? You do if you administer any employee benefit plans.(Workforce CENTRAL)(Long Term Disability)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles