Low-Angle Fires for MOUT.Few FA doctrine and literature sources mention fire direction in military operations in urban terrain (MOUT MOUT - military operations on urbanized terrain (US DoD)). However, the fire direction procedures for determining intervening crests in the mountainous terrain of the Mojave Desert at the National Training Center (NTC), Fort Irwin, California, apply to buildings as intervening crests in a MOUT environment. In addition, the procedures for low-angle fire adapted from FM 6-40 Tactics, Techniques and Procedures (TTP) for Field Artillery Manual Cannon Gunnery apply to fire direction in MOUT as the preferred firing angle. High-angle fires may be required to attack targets in built-up areas, but the probable error in range for high-angle fires found in the tabular firing tables (TFTs) is greater than for low-angle fires. In an urban environment, the difference between a few meters and 10 can lead to a round's impacting on an unintended target. This increase in probable error should be considered when using mortars, which are high-angle weapons. Low-angle fires will work in current MOUT training centers, villages, small towns and most cities whose buildings are three or less stories tall. However, high-angle fires may be the only option if the firing data for low-angle fires in cities with high buildings or skyscrapers indicates the structures will interfere with the projectile. Also, high-angle fires may be required to keep from hitting observers or other friendly troops positioned on top of buildings or other high points. The fire direction officer (FDO FDO - Failed During Operation FDO - Fee Determining/ation Official FDO - Fire Direction Officer FDO - Flexible Deterrent Options FDO - Flight Duty Officer FDO - Flight Dynamics Officer FDO - Focused Development Opportunities FDO - Force Deterrent Option FDO - Forecast Duty Officer (US Navy) FDO - Foreign Disclosure Office/Officer FDO - Foreningen Danske Olieberedskabslagre FDO - Freshman Dean's Office (Harvard University) FDO - Functional Device Object) ensures fires clear intervening crests or buildings. Computing an executive officer's (XO's) minimum quadrant elevation (Min QE QE - Queen of England QE - Key QE - Quadrant Elevation QE - Quadratic Equation QE - Qualification Examiner QE - Qualifying Examination QE - Quality Engineer QE - Quality Engineering QE - Quality Evaluation QE - Quality Expert QE - Quantitative Easing (Japan) QE - Quantum Economics QE - Quantum Efficiency QE - Quarterly Examination QE - Quick, Escape QE - Quod Est (Latin: Which Is) QE - Special Handling (Scott Catalogue prefix; philately)) solution offers one possibility; however, this method is based on the ascending branch of the trajectory and does not account for considerations as the round travels the entire length of the trajectory. The steps outlined in the figure take the FDO through the process of determining any potential problems with his low-angle fires due to intervening crests or buildings. The steps must be followed for every position the howitzer occupies. The procedures in the figure for low-angle fire are adapted for urban scenarios. Although urban areas are not new combat terrain, we have few MOUT TTP. We must tailor FA fire direction tactics, techniques and procedures for this environment. RELATED ARTICLE: 1. After the howitzer occupies a position, the fire direction officer (FDO) analyzes the terrain for intervening buildings. If map spotting is not possible, then he needs information from the S2 on the height and grid of each building. This is a critical procedure because most maps do not have building altitudes. If the S2 is unable to gather this information, then the ground forward observer (FO) reports obstruction data up through the chain of command until it reaches the artillery S2 or battalion FDO. Equally important, the observer must report his location with the correct altitude as he may be observing from an intervening building or crest. 2. Once the FDO determines the possible obstruction, the FDO determines the maximum altitude of the crest or building and computes the firing data to that point. (He determines the quadrant elevation, or QE, to the maximum altitude of the intervening building.) 3. The FDO adds the value of two Forks (Column 6, Table F of the Tabular Firing Table) to the QE determined in Step 2 to ensure the round-to-round variations (probable errors) will clear this point. 4. The FDO then records this quadrant and the round's charge on his situational map (SIT MAP) as a check to ensure rounds will clear the intervening buildings. 5. If variable time (VT VT - Vermont (US postal abbreviation) VT - Air Tahiti (French Polynesia, IATA airline code) VT - Maximum Airtow Speed (aviation) VT - Navy & Marine Training Aircraft Squadron VT - Navy Torpedo Squadron (US Navy; 1920s to 1950s) Vt - Thermal Voltage (transistors) VT - Tidal Volume VT - Torpedo Bombing Plane Squadron (US Navy aviation unit designation used from 1922 to1930)) fuzes are to be fired, the FDO must take additional steps to ensure the VT fuze does not arm before passing over the building and detonate due to reflected energy from the building. The VT fuze is designed to arm 3.0 seconds before the set time. It can, however, arm up to 5.5 seconds before the set time. The FDO must apply an additional interval of 70 meters to ensure that if the round is armed before passing over the building, it does not acquire any reflected radar energy. The FDO must identify the appropriate vertical interval (VI) based on these conditions. This is the VT VI." After determining the VT VI, the FDO proceeds through the following steps: (a) Determine the armed VT QE using VT VI and range-to-crest. (b) Determine the time-of-flight (TOE) to the crest. (c) Add 5.5 seconds to the TOE from Step B and express this value up to the next whole second. (d) Record both the armed VTQE and minimum fuze setting for the VT fuze on his SIT MAP. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion