Printer Friendly
The Free Library
6,672,335 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Lost check is income in the year originally received.


The constructive receipt Constructive receipt

The date a taxpayer receives dividends or other income, for use in the determination of taxes.


constructive receipt 
 doctrine was recently addressed in Walter, 8th Cir. (1998). This case involved the issue of when a lost check is income--in the year of receipt or the year of replacement.

Under the cash method of accounting, actual receipt of income is usually required before a taxpayer incurs a tax liability; an exception to this rule occurs when there is constructive receipt of income. Under Regs. Sec. 1.451-2(a), the doctrine of constructive receipt treats income unqualifiedly un·qual·i·fied  
adj.
1. Lacking the proper or required qualifications: unqualified for the job.

2.
 subject to the demand of a cash-basis taxpayer as immediately taxable, whether or not such income was actually received in cash. If income is credited to a taxpayer's account, set apart for the taxpayer or otherwise made available so that the taxpayer may draw on it at any time (or could have drawn on it during the tax year if notice of intention to withdraw had been given), income is deemed constructively received. However, income is not constructively received if the taxpayer's control of its receipt is subject to substantial limits or restrictions.

In this case, an IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  auditor discovered a document indicating a sale of steers to a company in March 1986; the document appeared to be the top portion of a business check. No deposit of this check was found in the taxpayer's records. The Walters contacted the company and determined that the original check was lost. A new check was issued in January 1988 and reported on the Walters' return in that year. The Walters (cash-basis taxpayers) unsuccessfully argued that this check was income in the replacement check year (1988), not the original receipt year (1986).

The taxpayers argued that the date of payment should relate to the check's delivery date only if it was presented and honored hon·or  
n.
1. High respect, as that shown for special merit; esteem: the honor shown to a Nobel laureate.

2.
a. Good name; reputation.

b.
. Therefore, a lost check that was never honored should not be taxable income Under the federal tax law, gross income reduced by adjustments and allowable deductions. It is the income against which tax rates are applied to compute an individual or entity's tax liability. The essence of taxable income is the accrual of some gain, profit, or benefit to a taxpayer.  in the year it was received. The Walters relied on the negotiable instruments negotiable instrument, bill of exchange, check, promissory note, or other written contract for payment that may serve as a substitute for money. It is simple in form and easy to transfer.  law as stated in Kahler, 18 TC 31 (1952). The law of negotiable instruments states that payment by check is considered to be a conditional payment, subject to the condition that the check will be honored on presentation. Once presented and honored, the date of payment relates back to the delivery date.

The Eighth Circuit disagreed and held that the doctrine of constructive receipt as developed in the Code takes precedence The order in which an expression is processed. Mathematical precedence is normally:

1. unary + and - signs
2. exponentiation
3. multiplication and division
4.
 over the law of negotiable instruments. The company that issued the check was not insolvent INSOLVENT. This word has several meanings. It signifies a person whose estate is not sufficient to pay his debts. Civ. Code of Louisiana, art. 1980.. A person is also said to be insolvent, who is under a present inability to answer, in the ordinary course of business, the responsibility  and did not place any substantial restrictions on the check. Losing the check was a restriction on collection imposed by the taxpayers (the payees) and not the payors; therefore, the check was income in the year of receipt and not the year of replacement.
COPYRIGHT 1998 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1998, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Goca, Neil P., III
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Oct 1, 1998
Words:447
Previous Article:Establishing the estate value of stock by using a buy-sell agreement. (case study)
Next Article:Nursing home qualifies as residential real property. (taxation)
Topics:



Related Articles
Out in the cold: Washington shows drug addicts the door.(impacts of federal welfare reform)(Cover Story)
Erroneous plan distributions and the 60-day rollover period. (retirement plans)
State tax pitfalls for LLCs.(limited liability companies)
Charity at bargain prices.
OUR OPINION; REALITY BITES.(Editorial)(Editorial)
GAMBLER INCURS THIRD STRIKE WITH GUILTY PLEAS IN BANK ROBBERIES.(News)
1998 RISE OF 2.1% IN SOCIAL SECURITY CHECKS LOWEST IN 10 YEARS.(News)
Gramps from yesteryear: two navigators. (Grampaw Pettibone).(EA-3B Skywarrior looses navigation)
Information reporting for payments to attorneys.
180 FAMILIES LOSE FEDERAL RENT SUBSIDY LAWBREAKERS THROWN OUT OF MUCH-NEEDED PROGRAM.(News)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles