Little Sisters' bookstore defeated.Vancouver -- In a rare setback for I homosexual activists, the Supreme Court of Canada The Supreme Court of Canada (French: Cour suprême du Canada) is the highest court of Canada and is the final court of appeal in the Canadian justice system.[1] , in a 7-2 decision, has ruled that a gay and lesbian "bookstore" carrying pornographic materials will not be entitled to a requested $2 million in public funding Public funding is money given from tax revenue or other governmental sources to an individual, organization, or entity. See also
CCRA Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement CCRA Campus Computer Resellers Alliance CCRA Certified Clinical Research Associate CCRA Commercial Credit Reference Agency CCRA California Court Reporters Association assessed whether some of the materials the store was importing were obscene or not. Writing for the majority, Justices Michel Bastarache J.E. Michel Bastarache (born June 10, 1947) is a Canadian lawyer, businessman, and puisne justice on the Supreme Court of Canada. Born in Quebec City, Bastarache earned his Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Moncton in 1967. and Louis LeBel upheld an earlier British Columbia Court of Appeals ruling. The judges said the case did not meet the criteria required for a cash advance, because the issues involved did not go beyond the interests of the litigant litigant n. any party to a lawsuit. This means plaintiff, defendant, petitioner, respondent, cross-complainant, and cross-defendant, but not a witness or attorney. LITIGANT. One engaged in a suit; one fond of litigation. to encompass those of the public at large. The store's lawyer said afterward that their legal offensive was finished unless a beneficiary emerged to donate a large amount of money. The Globe and Mails justice reporter noted that, following the elimination of the federal Court Challenges Program by the Conservative government, this ruling strikes an added blow to like-minded other groups hoping to use the Courts to challenge laws and decisions by government bodies. These groups had been buoyed by a 2003 Supreme Court ruling that created the notion of public funding of advance costs. But in the most recent decision, Justices Bastarache and LeBel said the standard required for such funding is a high one and it can be awarded only in rare and exceptional circumstances. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion