Listing occupational carcinogens.The review by Siemiatycki et al. (2004) is extremely valuable, and I am sure I will refer to it often in the future. However, I would like clarification on the risk classification of some chemicals. In the text the authors state that some chemicals, such as glass wool, were downgraded in risk between 1987 and 2002, from "possible human carcinogen epigenetic carcinogen one that does not itself damage DNA but causes alterations that predispose to cancer. genotoxic carcinogen one that reacts directly with DNA or with macromolecules that then react with DNA. car·cin·o·gen " (group 2B) classification, to unclassifiable (group 3). This contradicts Table 5 (Siemiatycki et al. 2004), where the chemicals are listed as "possible human carcinogens" and the authors cited the 2002 volumes of the IARC IARC - Illinois Association of Recycling Centers (now Illinois Recycling Association) IARC - Individual Aircraft Record Card IARC - International Aerial Robotics Competition (Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International) IARC - International Agency for Research on Cancer IARC - International Agency for Research on Cancer (World Health Organization) IARC - International Agricultural Research Center IARC - International Arctic Research Center (International Agency for Research on Cancer) Monographs, this gives the impression that this is the most up-to-date classification. The author declares she has no competing financial interests. REFERENCE Siemiatycki J, Richardson L, Straif K, Latreille B, Lakhani R, Campbell S, et al. 2004. Listing occupational carcinogens. Environ ENVIRON - Environment Health Perspect 112:1447-1459. Editor's note: Siemiatycki et al. submitted corrections to their paper, which were published as an Erratum in the February 2005 issue of EHP (Environ Health Perspect 113:A89). Alice Freund Mt. Sinai School of Medicine New York, New York E-mail: alice.freund@mssm.edu |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion