Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,122,084 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Lingenfelter v. Bd. Of County Com'rs of Reno Cty.


U.S. District Court

DUE PROCESS

ACCESS TO COURT

INITIAL APPEARANCE

Lingenfelter v. Bd. Of County Com'rs of Reno Cty., 359 F.Supp.2d 1163 (D.Kan. 2005). A detainee de·tain·ee  
n.
A person held in custody or confinement: a political detainee.

Noun 1. detainee - some held in custody
political detainee
 filed a civil rights complaint alleging that he was arrested without a warrant and detained de·tain  
tr.v. de·tained, de·tain·ing, de·tains
1. To keep from proceeding; delay or retard.

2. To keep in custody or temporary confinement:
 unlawfully for eight days without a judicial determination of probable cause Apparent facts discovered through logical inquiry that would lead a reasonably intelligent and prudent person to believe that an accused person has committed a crime, thereby warranting his or her prosecution, or that a Cause of Action has accrued, justifying a civil lawsuit. . The district court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss. The court held that the detainee stated a claim for violation of his right to a prompt judicial determination of probable cause. The court found that the detainee state a claim against a sheriff in his official and personal capacities, and denied qualified immunity Qualified immunity is a doctrine in United States law providing immunity from suit to government officials performing discretionary functions when their action did not violate clearly established law. Qualified immunity was created by the U.S.  from liability for the sheriff. The court found that the facts could conceivably con·ceive  
v. con·ceived, con·ceiv·ing, con·ceives

v.tr.
1. To become pregnant with (offspring).

2.
 be produced that the sheriff's alleged policy or custom of not effectuating probable cause determinations for detainees who were arrested without a warrant was a substantial factor in bringing about the alleged violation. (Reno County Jail, Kansas)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:pretrial detention, due process of law, arrested without a warrant
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U4KS
Date:May 1, 2005
Words:159
Previous Article:Johnson v. Karnes.
Next Article:Purcell ex rel. Estate of Morgan v. Toombs County.
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. District Court: CROWDING CONDITIONS MEDICAL CARE.
Pretrial detention.
Turner v. Kight.
Lingenfelter v. Bd. Of County Com'rs of Reno Cty.
Torres v. Stewart.
Bunyon v. Burke County.
Bunyon v. Burke County.
Bunyon v. Burke County.
Bunyon v. Burke County.
Atwood v. Vilsack.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles