Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,558,366 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Lewis v. Washington.


U.S. District Court

PROTECTIVE CUSTODY An arrangement whereby a person is safeguarded by law enforcement authorities in a location other than the person's home because his or her safety is seriously threatened.  

EQUAL PROTECTION

PROGRAMS

RELIGIOUS SERVICES

Lewis v. Washington, 265 F.Supp.2d 939 (N.D.Ill. 2003). State inmates filed a class action under [section] 1983 alleging that prison officials violated their constitutional rights while they were in protective custody. The district court granted summary judgment for the officials, in part. The court held that officials were entitled to qualified immunity Qualified immunity is a doctrine in United States law providing immunity from suit to government officials performing discretionary functions when their action did not violate clearly established law. Qualified immunity was created by the U.S.  because it was not clearly established that inmates in temporary protective custody after they appealed denial of their requests for permanent protective custody, had First Amendment rights to communal religious services, and Fourteenth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment, addition to the U.S. Constitution, adopted 1868. The amendment comprises five sections. Section 1


Section 1 of the amendment declares that all persons born or naturalized in the United States are American citizens and citizens
 rights to programs and services equivalent to those offered to other inmates. (Stateville Correctional Center Stateville Correctional Center is a maximum security state prison for men in Crest Hill, Illinois, USA. History
Opened in 1925, Stateville was built to accommodate 1,506 inmates.
, Illinois)
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:prisoners alleges violation of their constitutional rights
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U3IL
Date:Aug 1, 2003
Words:117
Previous Article:Boyd v. Anderson.(prisoners allegs violation of federally-protected rights)
Next Article:Serrano v. Francis.(inmate alleges correctional officer for administrative segregation)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. district court: diet exercise privileges religious services visits.(Administrative Segregation)
U.S. appeals court: private provider.(Liability)(Brief Article)
Smith v. Muccino.(prisoner on prisoner assault)(Brief Article)
Ali v. District of Columbia.(violation of United States Constitution. 11th Amendment)
Shakur v. Selsky.(RELIGION)(Brief Article)
Neal v. Lewis.(violation of constitutional rights)(Brief Article)
Neal v. Lewis.(violation of constitutional rights)(Brief Article)
Lewis v. Washington.(class action lawsuits)(Brief Article)
Searches.(Dye v. Lomen)(Farid v. Goord)(Saulsberry v. Arpaio)
Ziemba v. Rell.(class action lawsuits)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles