Letters of the law: no warrant? No problem.A MARCH REPORT from Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine confirmed what many critics of the PATRIOT Act Patriot Act: see USA PATRIOT Act. had long suspected: Under the law, warrantless searches and seizures In counterdrug operations, includes drugs and conveyances seized by law enforcement authorities and drug-related assets (monetary instruments, etc.) confiscated based on evidence that they have been derived from or used in illegal narcotics activities. have skyrocketed, especially via the FBI's national security letters. A national security letter (NSL NSL National Security Letter NSL National Soccer League (Australia) NSL Nursing Student Loans (US government; HRSA) NSL National Sporting Library NSL Norwegian Sign Language ) is a unilateral unilateral /uni·lat·er·al/ (-lat´er-al) affecting only one side. u·ni·lat·er·al adj. On, having, or confined to only one side. demand for information held by businesses or other third parties, including phone call, email, and credit card records. Before the PATRIOT Act passed in 2001, NSLs could be issued only in cases involving suspected foreign agents. The law allowed NSLs aimed at investigating terrorism, broadly defined, and not just to pursue leads but to develop them. It gave every FBI field office the authority to issue the letters, a power previously reserved for top officials at FBI headquarters. Not surprisingly, the number of NSLs has increased dramatically, from 8,000 in 2000 to an average of 50,000 per year between 2003 and 2005. Meanwhile, the focus of NSLs has shifted: By 2005 the letters, once aimed at foreign agents, targeted U.S. citizens 53 percent of the time. Inspector General Fine also discovered that investigators did not follow the law when they issued NSLs in the absence of "exigent circumstances An exigent circumstance, in the American law of criminal procedure, allows law enforcement to enter a structure without a warrant, or if they have a "knock and announce" warrant, without knocking and waiting for refusal under certain circumstances. ." Worse, Fine found that the FBI did not keep track of all the NSLs it issued and couldn't name the agencies with which it shared NSL-procured information. Lack of timely information sharing See data conferencing. , you'll recall, was a major hole in pre-9/11 anti-terror efforts. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion