Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,380,416 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Lesbians' divorce again attacks Canadian law.


Toronto--A lesbian couple made legal history on September 13, 2004, becoming the first divorced same-sex couple A same-sex couple is a pair of people of the same gender who pursue a romantic or sexual relationship together.

The term "same-sex relationship" may be used when the sexual orientation of participants in a same-sex relationship is not known.
 in Canada, and perhaps the world (Toronto Star The Toronto Star is Canada's highest-circulation newspaper, though its print edition is distributed almost entirely within Ontario. It is owned by Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd., a division of Star Media Group, a subsidiary of Torstar Corporation. , Sun Globe, Post, Sep. 14, 2004). The women were granted a divorce by Justice Ruth Mesbur. This judge also declared that the definition of spouse in Canada's Divorce Act Canada's Divorce Act (R.S., 1985, c. 3 (2nd Supp.)) is the federal Act that governs divorce in that country. The Constitution of Canada has explicitly made marriage and divorce the realm of the federal government rather than of the provinces.  is "unconstitutional, inoperative Void; not active; ineffectual.

The term inoperative is commonly used to indicate that some force, such as a statute or contract, is no longer in effect and legally binding upon the persons who were to be, or had been, affected by it.
, and of no force and effect."

Less than 24 hours after the couple's divorce petition was publicized, the Justice Department was forced to point out that excluding gays and lesbians from the definition of "spouse" in the Divorce Act would prohibit them from divorcing. Earlier, it had told the judge to delay the case until after the Supreme Court has ruled on the constitutionality of same-sex "marriage", but Ruth Mesbur ignored that advice.

The lesbians spent almost ten years together before "marrying" on June 18 2003, only days after the Ontario Court of Appeal The Court of Appeal for Ontario (frequently referred to as Ontario Court of Appeal) is headquartered in downtown Toronto, in historic Osgoode Hall.

The Court is composed of 22 judges who hear over 1 500 appeals each year, on issues of private law, constitutional
 legalized same-sex unions. They separated five days later. Lawyer Martha McCarthy Martha McCarthy is a Canadian lawyer who has represented same-sex couples who have changed the definition of marriage in Ontario and the Yukon.

McCarthy passed the Bar in Ontario in 1991, winning the Silver Medal and the Family Law and Advocacy Prizes, and has practiced
, who represented one of the women--(whose names have been kept secret by order of Judge Mesbur)--said that they thought marriage would solve all their problems, but quickly realized it was a mistake.

The lawyers for the lesbians, and Judge Mesbur also agreed that the existing definition should be struck down immediately. Said Mesbur, "The issue is before me and I must decide." McCarthy described her ruling as a "technical, check-the-box ruling", but said it is another indication that same-sex marriage in Canada On July 20, 2005, Canada became the fourth country in the world to legalize same-sex marriage nationwide with the approval of the Civil Marriage Act. Court decisions, starting in 2003, had already legalized same-sex marriage in eight out of ten provinces and one of three  is here to stay.

Comment

This divorce scenario may well have been concocted by the two women from the beginning, as part of the ongoing assault on marriage legislation.

Needless to say, the Globe and Mail hailed same-sex divorce as "a sign of progress" (editorial, Sep. 17, 04), and Ann Perry of the Toronto Star's editorial board called the ruling "courageous" and "correct" and thought that once again the court was "dragging" Canada out of "the dark ages" (Star, Sept. 18, 04). In our opinion, neither same-sex "marriage" nor same-sex divorce is a human right. See Doug McManaman's articles in our October issue, pp. 22-24.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Catholic Insight
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Canada
Publication:Catholic Insight
Geographic Code:1CANA
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:350
Previous Article:Canada admits HIV-positive immigrants.(Canada)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Divorce is expensive.(Canada)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
... Domestically attached. (legalizing same-sex marriage in the future)
Swallowing a camel.(gay rights legislation in Canada)(Brief Article)
Breaking up is hard to do.(Same-sex marriage legal protection)
Redefining family: some say marriage is exclusively between a man and a woman, but others say marriage can be between couples of the same sex and is...
Dodging the altar: gay men and lesbians aren't exactly rushing to marry in Canada. Why marriage equality isn't such a big deal up north.(Marriage)
My Vermont (begin strikethrough)civil union(end strikethrough) divorce.(my perspective)
Policy corruptions at external affairs.(Canada)(REAL Women of Canada and Campaign Life Coalition carry agenda to Canadian United Nations...
Why not gay 'marriage' in Canada?
Married in Canada.(First Person: Michael Rowe)
Same-sex marriage: the battle against God and country.(laws and religion)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles