Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,650,879 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP Files Class Action Suit against Celestica Inc.


NEW YORK New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of
 -- Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol  ("Lerach Coughlin") (http://www.lerachlaw.com/cases/celestica/) today announced that a class action lawsuit class action lawsuit

A lawsuit in which one party or a limited number of parties sue on behalf of a larger group to which the parties belong. For example, investors may bring a class action lawsuit against a brokerage firm that has actively promoted a tax
 has been commenced in the United States District Court United States District Court

In the U.S., any of the 94 trial courts of general jurisdiction in the federal judicial system. Each state, as well as the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, has at least one federal district court.
 for the Southern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of Celestica Inc. ("Celestica" or the "Company") (NYSE NYSE

See: New York Stock Exchange
:CLS (Common Language Specification) The structure and syntax of .NET and CLI programming languages. See .NET. ) securities during the period between July 27, 2006 and December 12, 2006, inclusive (the "Class Period").

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than 60 days from today. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact plaintiff's counsel, Samuel H. Rudman or David A. Rosenfeld of Lerach Coughlin at 800/449-4900 or 619/231-1058 or via e-mail at wsl@lerachlaw.com. If you are a member of this class, you can view a copy of the complaint as filed or join this class action online at http://www.lerachlaw.com/cases/celestica/. Any member of the purported class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.

The complaint charges Celestica and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Celestica provides electronic manufacturing services to original equipment manufacturers in the computing, telecommunications, aerospace and defense, automotive, consumer electronics, and industrial sectors in Asia, the Americas, and Europe.

According to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 the complaint, throughout the Class Period, defendants issued numerous statements describing the Company's financial performance and future prospects, which they attributed, in part, to success of the Company's restructuring activities and improvements in the Mexican and European operations. The complaint alleges that these statements were materially false and misleading when made because defendants failed to disclose and/or misrepresented the following adverse facts, among others: (i) that the Company was experiencing declining demand in its Mexican operations and that division was carrying significant amounts of unneeded inventory which would have to be written off; (ii) that the Company was experiencing declining demand in its Information Technology ("IT") and communications market segments as its larger customers scaled back purchases; and (iii) as a result of the foregoing, there was no reasonable basis to project adjusted earnings per share ranging from $0.12 to $0.20. When this undisclosed information later became public, shares of Celestica common stock declined.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of the securities of Celestica during the Class Period (the "Class"). The plaintiff is represented by Lerach Coughlin, which has expertise in prosecuting investor class actions and extensive experience in actions involving financial fraud.

Lerach Coughlin, a 180-lawyer firm with offices in San Diego San Diego (săn dēā`gō), city (1990 pop. 1,110,549), seat of San Diego co., S Calif., on San Diego Bay; inc. 1850. San Diego includes the unincorporated communities of La Jolla and Spring Valley. Coronado is across the bay. , San Francisco San Francisco (săn frănsĭs`kō), city (1990 pop. 723,959), coextensive with San Francisco co., W Calif., on the tip of a peninsula between the Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay, which are connected by the strait known as the Golden , Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850. , New York, Boca Raton, Washington, D.C., Houston, Philadelphia and Seattle, is active in major litigations pending in federal and state courts throughout the United States and has taken a leading role in many important actions on behalf of defrauded investors, consumers, and companies, as well as victims of human rights violations. Lerach Coughlin lawyers have been responsible for more than $20 billion in aggregate recoveries. The Lerach Coughlin Web site (http://www.lerachlaw.com) has more information about the firm.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Jan 12, 2007
Words:544
Previous Article:Bowater Announces Date for Release of Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2006 Financial Results.
Next Article:Enesco Group, Inc. Announces Proposed Sale Through Chapter 11 Proceedings.
Topics:



Related Articles
Suiting up: when the top securities class-action law firm becomes two firms, D&O insurers could take a double hit.(Directors & Officers)
Class-action firms and new cases.(Comment)(Letter to the Editor)
Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP Files Class Action Suit against Warner Chilcott Limited.
Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP Files Class Action Suit against AtriCure, Inc.
Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP Files Class Action Suit against Technical Olympic USA, Inc.
Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP Files Class Action Suit against Globalstar, Inc.
Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP Files Class Action Suit against Coast Financial Holdings, Inc.
Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Menu Foods Inc. Over Poisoned Pet Food.
Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP Files Class Action Suit against Alvarion, Ltd.
Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP Announces $17 Million Jury Verdict Against American Family Mutual Insurance Co. in Auto Parts Case.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles