Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP Files Class Action Suit against DRDGOLD Limited.NEW YORK New York, state, United States New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of -- Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol ("Lerach Coughlin") (http://www.lerachlaw.com/cases/drdgold/) today announced that a class action lawsuit class action lawsuit A lawsuit in which one party or a limited number of parties sue on behalf of a larger group to which the parties belong. For example, investors may bring a class action lawsuit against a brokerage firm that has actively promoted a tax has been commenced in the United States District Court United States District Court In the U.S., any of the 94 trial courts of general jurisdiction in the federal judicial system. Each state, as well as the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, has at least one federal district court. for the Southern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of DRDGOLD Limited ("DRDGOLD") (NASDAQ NASDAQ in full National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations U.S. market for over-the-counter securities. Established in 1971 by the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), NASDAQ is an automated quotation system that reports on :DROOY), formerly known as Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited, securities during the period between October 23, 2003 and February 24, 2005 (the "Class Period"). If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than 60 days from today. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact plaintiff's counsel, Samuel H. Rudman or David A. Rosenfeld of Lerach Coughlin at 800/449-4900 or 619/231-1058 or via e-mail at wsl@lerachlaw.com. If you are a member of this class, you can view a copy of the complaint as filed or join this class action online at http://www.lerachlaw.com/cases/drdgold/. Any member of the purported class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. The complaint charges DRDGOLD and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. DRDGOLD is a gold exploration and mining company. The Company operates gold mines through its South African and Australasian operations. The complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, defendants made numerous statements regarding: (i) the successful restructuring of the Company's North West Operations in South America South America, fourth largest continent (1991 est. pop. 299,150,000), c.6,880,000 sq mi (17,819,000 sq km), the southern of the two continents of the Western Hemisphere. ; (ii) the Company's ability to reduce the negative impact of the increasing value of the South African Rand “ZAR” redirects here. For the former republic, see South African Republic. The rand is the currency of South Africa. It takes its name from the Witwatersrand (White-waters-ridge versus the U.S. Dollar; and (iii) the increasing strength of the Company's balance sheet. In truth and in fact, the Company's problems with its North West Operations were never fully resolved and resulted in the Company being forced to record an impairment charge for the full value of its mining assets there. Moreover, despite representations to the contrary, the Company continued to be negatively impacted by the increasing value of the South African Rand. As detailed in the complaint, these problems resulted in the Company being forced to announce that it might not be able to operate as a going concern. When this information was belatedly disclosed to the public, shares of DRDGOLD fell more than 25%, on extraordinarily heavy volume. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of DRDGOLD securities during the Class Period (the "Class"). The plaintiff is represented by Lerach Coughlin, which has expertise in prosecuting investor class actions and extensive experience in actions involving financial fraud. Lerach Coughlin, a 150-lawyer firm with offices in San Diego San Diego (săn dēā`gō), city (1990 pop. 1,110,549), seat of San Diego co., S Calif., on San Diego Bay; inc. 1850. San Diego includes the unincorporated communities of La Jolla and Spring Valley. Coronado is across the bay. , San Francisco San Francisco (săn frănsĭs`kō), city (1990 pop. 723,959), coextensive with San Francisco co., W Calif., on the tip of a peninsula between the Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay, which are connected by the strait known as the Golden , Los Angeles, New York, Boca Raton, Washington, D.C., Houston, Philadelphia and Seattle, is active in major litigations pending in federal and state courts throughout the United States and has taken a leading role in many important actions on behalf of defrauded investors, consumers, and companies, as well as victims of human rights violations. Lerach Coughlin lawyers have been responsible for more than $20 billion in aggregate recoveries. The Lerach Coughlin Web site (http://www.lerachlaw.com) has more information about the firm. |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion