Printer Friendly

Lekas v. Briley.

U.S. Appeals Court

CONDITIONS OF SEGREGATION

Lekas v. Briley, 405 F.3d 602 (7th Cir. 2005). A state inmate sued several prison officials under [section] 1983, alleging constitutional violations stemming from his placement and confinement in disciplinary segregation. The district court dismissed the case and the inmate appealed. The appeals court affirmed. The appeals court held that the inmate's alleged conditions of disciplinary segregation at the prison were not so atypical and significant as to constitute a deprivation of a liberty interest. The inmate alleged that while in segregation he was unable to participate in prison programs, educational programs, work programs, and contact visits. (Pinckneyville Correction Center, Illinois)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:conditions of confinement
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U3IL
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Words:109
Previous Article:King v. Frank.
Next Article:Phelps v. Tucker.
Topics:


Related Articles
U.S. district court AIDS. (Classification).
U.S. district court double bunking. (Conditions of Confinement).
Ortiz v. Voinovich.
Munoz v. Kolender.
Magluta v. Samples.
Magluta v. Samples.
Conditions of confinement.
Lekas v. Briley.
Rodriguez v. Briley.
Atkins v. County of Orange.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters