Printer Friendly

Labeling debate continues.

Even though Anheuser-Busch announced last week that it would begin including the alcohol content on labels of the Budweiser group of products, other brewers have not been quick to follow suit.

A-B's decision is ironic since the company has fought such a move for years, most recently in court when rival Adolph Coors Co. challenged the labeling law as unconstitutional.

Last fall, a federal judge struck down the law that had kept alcohol content information off beer labels since the 1930s.

Although the U.S. government is appealing the rulings, brewers now have the option of noting the potency of their brews on cans and labels.

Now despite its victory, Coors has chosen not to disclose alcohol content on its products until it is certain that such a move will be both permanent and nationwide. Miller Brewing Co. has taken a similar stance.

Their uncertainty reflects a Justice Department decision to appeal the Coors decision while the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms has approved new labels for Anheuser-Busch and a Chicago-based importer of European beers. ATF says several other parties have applications pending.

Several states have separate statutes preventing content disclosure, but Anheuser-Busch says it will begin lobbying them to fall in line with the new federal rules.

Among those states barring alcohol content labeling are New York, Texas, Pennsylvania and Illinois.

The labeling debate flared in 1991 when G. Heileman Brewing Co. sought to introduce PowerMaster malt liquor, with 7.3 percent alcohol by volume. The ATF eventually rejected Heileman's product proposal.

Coors, which had been fighting a "wimpy beer" whispering campaign by competitors, decided to get the law changed to set a "level playing field" for consumer choice.

Fears of "strength wars" among brewers are unfounded, said Coors, because today's consumers are looking for less alcohol, not more. Disclosing alcohol content on the product's label would allow consumers to make better-informed buying decisions, the company said.

The new labels on Budweiser, Bud Light and Bud Dry will begin appearing next month. The labels will show that Budweiser and Bud Dry contain 5 percent alcohol by volume, while Bud Light contains 4.2 percent.

Microbrewers have supported disclosing alcohol content, according to the Institute for Brewing Studies. Microbrews often contain more alcohol than national brands, the lBS said.
COPYRIGHT 1993 Business Journals, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1993 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:alcohol content on beer labels
Publication:Modern Brewery Age
Date:Mar 22, 1993
Words:380
Previous Article:Anheuser-Busch announces more New Jersey distributor assignments.
Next Article:Homebrewer will create recipe for Pete's 1993 Wicked Winter Ale.
Topics:


Related Articles
Bottle, can labels could lead to beer strength wars.
Miller considering support of alcohol content labeling on all beer bottles.
Cutbush pushes for alcohol labeling bill.
Alcohol content labeling appealed.
Anheuser-Busch to begin alcohol content labeling on Budweiser.
Supreme Court to examine alcohol content labeling case.
Battle continues over Crazy Horse malt liquor on appeal.
Belgian brewers sue Coors Brewing Co.
Flying Dog wins right to use Road Dog label.
Micro defuses copyright fight with cheeky label.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters