LETTERS TO L.A. LIFE BRIDE MADE HER CHOICE FOR REASON.Did Susan Cashman (L.A. Life, Oct. 21) really have to disclose her sexual preference to get her point across? She might as well be in the pocket of those that feel the need to express their views publicly, as homosexuals tend to do. Apparently, she forgets that the subject of Sunita Farrelly's opinion (L.A. Life, Oct. 7) was that it was the bride's day and she could invite whomever whom·ev·er pron. The objective case of whoever. See Usage Note at who. whomever pron the objective form of whoever: she wanted. The person the bride chose not to invite was a homosexual. The bride's choice was either due to her religious beliefs or because she thought the sexual act between two men disgusting; the bride didn't want that distraction. However, Cashman's diatribe di·a·tribe n. A bitter, abusive denunciation. [Latin diatriba, learned discourse, from Greek diatrib against Farrelly, as much as she portrays herself as a tolerant person, was quite intolerant. I'm sorry, Susan, but I didn't read anywhere Farrelly hated homosexuals; I read that she doesn't endorse immorality IMMORALITY. that which is contra bonos mores. In England, it is not punishable in some cases, at the common law, on, account of the ecclesiastical jurisdictions: e. g. adultery. But except in cases belonging to the ecclesiastical courts, the court of king's bench is the custom morum, and and perversion Perversion See also Bestiality. bondage and domination (B & D) practices with whips, chains, etc. for sexual pleasure. [Western Cult.: Misc. . - Jessica C. Chavez Van Nuys |
|
||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion