LETTERS TO L.A. LIFE : READER GIVES THUMBS-UP TO FILM CRITICS STRAUSS, WHIPP.In the Jan. 17 L.A. Life was a letter to the editor from David Ian David Ian Ian[1] (born Chadwell Heath, Greater London in 1961), is a former actor, who turned theatre producer in 1991 to become the most powerful man in UK theatre in 2005 according to The Stage [2]. Marsh of Woodland Hills blasting Bob Strauss and Glenn Whipp. Although I am an avid AVID Cardiology A clinical trial–Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators that compared the effect of implantable defibrillators vs the best medical therapy–antiarrhythmics for survivors of MI or those with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia moviegoer mov·ie·go·er n. One who goes to see movies. mov ie·go ing adj. and personal critic to anyone who will listen, I
think these two reviewers are among the best in Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850. and the
nation. Their reviews are usually always insightful and honest, and not
too grand or rude.
I think critics are, above all, a necessary joy and evil to moviegoers. As far as Mr. Marsh's assertion that real normal-minded people should review movies, that is absurd. Movies are, as Mr. Marsh says, ``undeniably art forms,'' and in the past 20 years are the major art form, and they look to become more prevalent in the future. And as a form of entertainment, they should be held up to the same standards as art. Cary Dean Bazan Glendale This letter is addressed to Daily News film reviewer re·view·er n. One who reviews, especially one who writes critical reviews, as for a newspaper or magazine. reviewer Noun a person who writes reviews of books, films, etc. Noun 1. Bob Strauss: For the record, I am not not - repeat, am not - an Academy nomination voter. I'm glad the awesome task is not my responsibility this year, although I do have my opinions as does everyone. In your ``Dear Academy voters'' article of Jan. 22, your ``opinions'' are clearly evident in your ``reminders'' about the films you deemed worthy and about those you deemed not worthwhile. I felt the article, while with merit, was somewhat patronizing to the people you were addressing and at the same time a bit heavy-handed in its attempt to influence those in whose direction it was aimed. But then maybe that's part of the job description. I just wish there was - and maybe there is not - a fairer, more objective way to review and criticize crit·i·cize v. crit·i·cized, crit·i·ciz·ing, crit·i·ciz·es v.tr. 1. To find fault with: criticized the decision as unrealistic. See Usage Note at critique. the enormous amount of films to be considered. - Frank Consolo Granada Hills |
|
||||||||||||||||

ie·go
ing adj.
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion