Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,701,494 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

King v. Frank.


U.S. District Court

VIDEO

King v. Frank, 328 F.Supp.2d 940 (W.D.Wis. 2004). An inmate INMATE. One who dwells in a part of another's house, the latter dwelling, at the same time, in the said house. Kitch. 45, b; Com. Dig. Justices of the Peace, B 85; 1 B. & Cr. 578; 8 E. C. L. R. 153; 2 Dowl. & Ry. 743; 8 B. & Cr. 71; 15 E. C. L. R. 154; 2 Man. & Ry. 227; 9 B. & Cr.  sued a state correctional institutional claiming that conditions of confinement conĀ·fineĀ·ment
n.
1. The act of restricting or the state of being restricted in movement.

2. Lying-in.



confinement
 violated his constitutional rights. The district court held that the inmate stated a claim with his allegation that the provision of visitation VISITATION. The act of examining into the affairs of a corporation.
     2. The power of visitation is applicable only to ecclesiastical and eleemosynary corporations. 1 Bl. Com. 480; 2 Kid on Corp. 174.
 through a poor quality closed circuit television system violated his First Amendment rights. The court also found that a claim was stated by the constant illumination of the inmate's cell. The court held that the inmate's Eighth Amendment rights were not violated when he was subjected to the noise of other inmates as they responded to television programs they were watching or sang along with the radio. (Waupun Correctional Institution The Waupun Correctional Institution is a maximum security penitentiary near the center of Waupun, Wisconsin. The prison is currently under the command of Warden Michael Thurmer. , Wisconsin)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment and United States Constitution. 1st Amendment
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U3WI
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:122
Previous Article:Webster v. City of New York.(violation of due process of law)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Odenwalt v. Gillis.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment and United States Constitution. 14th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Ali v. District of Columbia.(violation of United States Constitution. 11th Amendment)
Terry Ex Rel. Terry v. Hill.(PRETRIAL DETENTION)(Brief Article)
Ainsworth v. Stanley.(PROGRAMS-PRISONER)(Brief Article)
Wever v. Lincoln County, Nebraska.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Davis v. Hall.(FALSE IMPRISONMENT/ARREST)(violation of United States Constitution. 14th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Davis v. Hall.(due process violations)(Brief Article)
Davis v. Hall.(violation of due process of law)(Brief Article)
Lewis v. Washington.(prisoners alleges violation of their constitutional rights )(Brief Article)
Lewis v. Washington.(class action lawsuits)(Brief Article)
Lewis v. Washington.(RELIGION)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles