Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,787,283 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

King v. Frank.


U.S. District Court

LIGHTS

NOISE

King v. Frank, 328 F.Supp.2d 940 (W.D. Wis. 2004). An inmate INMATE. One who dwells in a part of another's house, the latter dwelling, at the same time, in the said house. Kitch. 45, b; Com. Dig. Justices of the Peace, B 85; 1 B. & Cr. 578; 8 E. C. L. R. 153; 2 Dowl. & Ry. 743; 8 B. & Cr. 71; 15 E. C. L. R. 154; 2 Man. & Ry. 227; 9 B. & Cr.  sued a state correctional institutional claiming that conditions of confinement conĀ·fineĀ·ment
n.
1. The act of restricting or the state of being restricted in movement.

2. Lying-in.



confinement
 violated his constitutional rights. The district court held that the inmate stated a claim with his allegation that the provision of visitation VISITATION. The act of examining into the affairs of a corporation.
     2. The power of visitation is applicable only to ecclesiastical and eleemosynary corporations. 1 Bl. Com. 480; 2 Kid on Corp. 174.
 through a poor quality closed circuit television system violated his First Amendment rights. The court also found that a claim was stated by the constant illumination of the inmate's cell. The court held that the inmate's Eighth Amendment rights were not violated when he was subjected to the noise of other inmates as they responded to television programs they were watching or sang along with the radio. (Waupun Correctional Institution The Waupun Correctional Institution is a maximum security penitentiary near the center of Waupun, Wisconsin. The prison is currently under the command of Warden Michael Thurmer. , Wisconsin)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:123
Previous Article:Jones-El v. Berge.(violation of prisoners' rights)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Magluta v. Samples.(CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Ex-offenders.(prisoner litigation)(Brief Article)
Conditions of confinement.(Brief Article)
Koch v. Lewis.(CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT)(violation of right to due process)
Ortiz v. Voinovich.(sexual abuse by corrections officer)(Brief Article)
Koch v. Lewis.(FACILITIES)(violation of civil rights by Arizona. Department of Corrections)
Freeman v. Berge.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Jones v. Blanas.(PRETRIAL DETENTION)(Brief Article)
Magluta v. Samples.(DISCIPLINE)(violation of constitutional rights)(Brief Article)
Magluta v. Samples.(FACILITIES)(violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)
King v. Frank.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment and United States Constitution. 1st Amendment)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles