Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,550,368 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Kerry, our erring brother: the need for quality control.


What is all the fuss about Catholic bishops refusing Communion to prochoice politicians? Controlling access to Jesus Christ has been a security nightmare since the day he first announced his mission on Earth. No one should blame the bishops for trying to do their job. Even the apostles--the original bishops--weren't very good at it. After all, the man was crazy--welcoming anyone and everyone, at any time of the day or night--it was all the bishops could do to keep him in one piece.

They were always thinking only of him and his comfort. Keep the children back, they snapped at the mothers pushing their babies toward him, hoping for a special blessing. Jesus is tired. He needs rest. And what did the guy say? "Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not, for of such is the kingdom of heaven."

Well, OK. Kids are pretty harmless. Cute for photographs, too. But lepers leper /lep·er/ (lep´er) a person with leprosy; a term now in disfavor.

lep·er (lp
? Epileptics? Prostitutes? Weeping women--known sinners!--washing his feet with their tears? Who could fault the bishops for getting exasperated? The problem with the founders of movements is sentimentality: there he goes again, clinging to the original concept, insisting on being available twenty-four/seven, not getting the point.

The point was, and is, quality control. Consistency. If the church (the voice of Jesus, after all) takes a position, then it has to have a united front where that issue is concerned. People will get confused if the bishops are seen to say one thing and do another.

The Catholic position on abortion is well known and unequivocal: babies have the right to life from the moment of conception. Even the most vocal prochoicer would have a hard time imagining Jesus operating a suction machine. So why should openly prochoice politicians get to receive Jesus in the sacrament of Holy Communion? It doesn't make sense.

You have to pity the bishops. Jesus didn't make it easy for them. He claimed to be the Good Shepherd, but he would happily rush off in search of the one lost sheep, leaving the ninety-nine who stayed where they belonged to find their own way home. He preached about the evil of adultery, but when faced with a woman who admitted to having done it, saved her from the crowd that had gathered to stone her. Even in the last hours before his death, when Peter--the first pope!--tried to prevent his arrest by slicing the ear of one of the soldiers apprehending him, Jesus stood in his way and healed the man on the spot.

But still. Abortion is abortion. John Kerry and others like him cannot expect to publicly reject the Catholic position on this issue and still get to receive Communion.

For what it's worth, Jesus left some fairly strict instructions about how to deal with an erring brother like Kerry: "If your brother does something wrong, go and have it out with him alone, between your two selves. If he listens to you, you have won back your brother. If he does not listen, take one or two others with you: the evidence of two or three witnesses is necessary to sustain any charge. If he still refuses to listen, report it to the community." But then, as he did so often, Jesus spoiled it all with his last line: "And if he refuses to listen to the community, treat him like a pagan or a tax collector."

Since tax collectors and pagans were his special favorites, people he would go out of his way to meet and have dinner with, it's better to forget his advice altogether. These are dangerous times, and public figures like John Kerry should have no trouble understanding this. He has his security force, Jesus has his. It's just the way it is.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Commonweal Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Of Several Minds
Author:McGowan, Jo
Publication:Commonweal
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Sep 24, 2004
Words:632
Previous Article:Clear skies?
Next Article:The health-care issue: where Bush & Kerry differ.(Of Several Minds)
Topics:



Related Articles
Follow the feelings beyond the numbers.(Commentary)(Presidential election)
Sister of US presidential candidate seeks voters abroad.(Breves)
What's at stake: many issues will confront whoever wins in November. But in choosing between George W. Bush and John Kerry, voters will decide what...
Campaign 2004: are guile & force enough?(Continuing the Conversation)
Smart and witty too.(To the Editors)(Letter to the Editor)
The un-Kerry: meet John O'Neill, the Vietnam vet who once debated John Kerry on The Dick Cavett Show.(Campaign 2004)
The Bush wedge.(George W. Bush)
Kerry concedes: "In an American election, there are no losers, because whether or not our candidates are successful, the next morning we all wake up...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles