Printer Friendly

Kenrich Petrochemicals.

Kenrich Petrochemicals, Bayonne, NJ, has filed a demand for arbitration against Ajinomoto Co., Tokyo, Japan, before the American Arbitration Association in New York. Kenrich invoked the terms of the Japan-American Trade Arbitration Agreement of 1952 in its demand for arbitration against the Japanese multinational. In 1980, Kenrich entered into a license agreement with Ajinomoto where Kenrich licensed its revolutionary titanate technology to Ajinomoto. Titanate technology is used in the polymer industry. The license agreement, which called for technological and marketing cooperation between the two companies, was meant to allow Kenrich to expand into the fast-growing Japanese and Pacific basin markets. The license agreement provides that Ajinomoto will pay a royalty based on a percentage of net sales value. If the aggregate royalties payable in any one year do not exceed a minimum royalty, then the minimum royalty is to be paid for that year. Since 1980, Ajinomoto has only paid the minimum royalty, alleging that the aggregate royalties payable under the license did not exceed this value. Ajinomoto's position that its sales never exceeded the minimum amount is said to be directly contradicted by overwhelming evidence in the marketplace.
COPYRIGHT 1995 Lippincott & Peto, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1995, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:files for arbitration of licensing agreement dispute with Ajinomoto Co.
Publication:Rubber World
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Sep 1, 1995
Words:189
Previous Article:Union Carbide, Lyondell Petrochemical and Quantum Chemical.
Next Article:Ciba-Geigy.
Topics:


Related Articles
Court decisions undermine forced arbitration.
Six steps to succeeding in arbitration.
Stay out of court.
Defeating mandatory arbitration clauses.
Workers are blocked, not barred, from court: the Circuit City ruling may seem like a gift to employers seeking to enforce mandatory arbitration...
Arbitration agreements are subject to scrutiny.
Arbitration of discrimination claims under building service labor contracts.
Arbitration of discrimination claims under building service labor contracts.
When arbitration subverts democracy: by blocking access to the courts, mandatory arbitration and separability undermine the rule of law.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters