KEATING WINS NEW TRIAL : JUDGE OVERTURNS FEDERAL CONVICTION.Byline: Janet Gilmore Daily News Staff Writer A federal judge ordered a new trial Monday for Charles Keating Please help improve the article by adding information and sources on neglected viewpoints, or by summarizing and Jr., saying that jurors who convicted the Lincoln Savings & Loan boss of fraud and racketeering Traditionally, obtaining or extorting money illegally or carrying on illegal business activities, usually by Organized Crime . A pattern of illegal activity carried out as part of an enterprise that is owned or controlled by those who are engaged in the illegal activity. were contaminated contaminated, v 1. made radioactive by the addition of small quantities of radioactive material. 2. made contaminated by adding infective or radiographic materials. 3. an infective surface or object. by learning of an earlier conviction. Prosecutors told U.S. District Judge Mariana Pfaelzer Mariana Pfaelzer is a U.S. District Court Judge in the Ninth Circuit. She is probably best remembered for her role in striking down California's Proposition 187, which would have denied services to illegal aliens. that it wasn't clear the jurors had learned of Keating's prior state court conviction. If they had, the effect on their deliberations was negligible, prosecutors argued. But Pfaelzer sided with Keating's lawyer, who said that similar cases had been reversed when the contamination was nowhere near ``as pervasive or as detailed as it was in this case.'' After an hour of arguments, Pfaelzer simply said ``All right, the motion's granted.'' Keating's state convictions in Lincoln's failure were overturned by an appellate court A court having jurisdiction to review decisions of a trial-level or other lower court. An unsuccessful party in a lawsuit must file an appeal with an appellate court in order to have the decision reviewed. months ago. Federal prosecutors said they will ``absolutely'' prosecute Keating again. Free on bond since allegations of juror juror n. any person who actually serves on a jury. Lists of potential jurors are chosen from various sources such as registered voters, automobile registration or telephone directories. misconduct were first aired in October, Keating, 73, emerged from the federal courtroom in Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850. hugging his small granddaughter. ``Feeling good?'' a friend asked him. ``Absolutely,'' he answered, beaming, and accepting a firm handshake. Keating became a symbol of the country's S&L debacle after his Phoenix-based American Continental Corp. bought Irvine-based Lincoln and invested its taxpayer-insured deposits in high-risk land, hotel and securities deals. The collapse of Keating's empire rendered worthless the junk bonds junk bond, a bond that involves greater than usual risk as an investment and pays a relatively high rate of interest, typically issued by a company lacking an established earnings history or having a questionable credit history. issued by his American Continental Corp., leaving thousands of mostly elderly bondholders out of nearly $282 million. ``Our reaction as bondholders, is one of great frustration and confusion,'' said Thomas Shelley, one of the co-founders of the Lincoln ACC See adaptive cruise control. Bondholders Action Committee. ``This is the clearest-cut case of fraud in the annals of history. ``It's very hard to explain this to aged, anxious, tension-riddled senior citizens. They just won't understand. These technicalities are rearing their ugly head again, and questioning our judicial system.'' But outside court, Keating lawyer Stephen C. Neal talked about the brilliance of his client's investments and suggested that investors would have profited if the government did not interfere. ``Both of these trials,'' Neal said of the federal and state case, ``were permeated with fundamental problems . . . he is an innocent man.'' Neal argued in court that ``public venom'' toward his client should not prevent the judge from following the law and agreeing that his client was severely prejudiced when at least two jurors in the federal case discussed the state conviction. He noted that sworn affidavits and comments from jurors inside the judge's chambers in October show that one juror learned of the state court conviction before jury deliberations and while reading a newspaper headline. Another juror asked a fellow panelist about the outcome of the state case and was told it ended in conviction. Several jurors knew that both cases involved older investors and that the state and both case involved the same basic allegations. Sharon McCaslin, an assistant U.S. attorney, contended that one juror's thinking was ``muddled'' and unreliable and that another juror appeared to be mistaken. In the worst case scenario
Worst Case Scenario is a reality show aired on TBS in 2002 in the U.S.. , she contended, a 20-second conversation occurred. ``They relied upon the evidence in this case,'' McCaslin said. ``There is absolutely no doubt that if it (jury misconduct) happened, it could not have possibly affected the verdict.'' The fate of Keating's son, co-defendant Charles Keating III, was not clear Monday. Pfaelzer told deputy public defender public defender, governmental official who represents indigent persons accused of crime. U.S. Supreme Court decisions expanding the right to counsel to pretrial proceedings and holding that a person cannot be sentenced to even one day in jail unless a lawyer was Paul Abrams that he had presented too little evidence for her to feel comfortable in ruling whether the son should have a new trial. Abrams argued that ``the father and son were essentially linked at the hip'' in the prosecution case, and that the younger Keating must be granted a new trial as well. The judge said she would study the issue further and rule today. CAPTION(S): Photo PHOTO (color) Charles Keating Jr. and his attorney, Steve Neal, talk with reporters outside federal court in Los Angeles. Associated Pres |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion