Browse Judicial review topic

Subtopics (10)

• Analysis
• Cases
• Evaluation
• Forecasts and trends
• History
• Interpretation and construction
• Laws, regulations and rules
• Planning
• Research
• Standards

Articles

Title	Author	Type	Date	Words
The Canadian Position: Can Parties To An Arbitration Agreement Vary The Statutory Scope Of Judicial Review Of The Award?			Sep 14, 2008	3708
Aiming for fair and accurate: a conflict of interest must be considered in judicial review. But how?	Darras, Frank N.		Sep 1, 2008	583
Kicking discovery orders upstairs: you may not have to wait until the end of your case to raise discovery issues on appeal. Special writs and other remedies can get harmful or onerous discovery orders before an appellate court - before they cause irreparable harm to your case.	Fluegel, Wil		Jun 1, 2008	2963
Limiting Agreements For Broader Judicial Review Of Arbitral Awards Under The Federal Arbitration Act.			May 20, 2008	895
Federal Arbitration Act: Contract Cannot Expand Scope Of Judicial Review.			Apr 30, 2008	562
Divided Supreme Court Rules That The Scope Of Judicial Review To Confirm Arbitral Awards May Not Be Expanded By Agreement.		Case overview	Apr 15, 2008	1881
New Book Considers the Perennial Question of Law and Politics: What Role Do the Founding Fathers Play in Legitimizing Contemporary Judicial Review?			Apr 1, 2008	255
"The Case Of The Century": U.S. Supreme Court Decides (Almost) The Extent Of Judicial Review Of Arbitration Awards.		Case overview	Mar 27, 2008	480
Tales of the tipsy coachman: being right for the wrong reason: the tipsy coachman is alive and well and living in Florida.	Herb, James A.; Kauffman, Jay L.		Dec 1, 2007	3782
The Case Of The Century": U.S. Supreme Court Hears Arguments On Judicial Review Of Arbitration Awards.		Case overview	Nov 13, 2007	465
Security Of Payment Decisions No Longer Reviewable Under Queensland Judicial Review Act.	Lipman, Bede	Brief article	Nov 1, 2007	276
Aged-care providers seek judicial review.			Aug 1, 2007	172
Tipping the ole tipsy coachman over in his grave: an inequity of appellate review.	Muniz, H. Michael		Jul 1, 2007	8163
Appellate standards of review in criminal matters.	Luyster, Julia		Jun 1, 2007	4634
Which writ is which? A trial attorney's guide to Florida's extraordinary writs.	Hendricks, Valeria		Apr 1, 2007	3435
Appellate standards of review.	Sepler, Harvey J.		Apr 1, 2007	1523
Seeking appellate review - how to perfect your appeal.	Brannock, Steven L.		Apr 1, 2007	3962
Experience matters: the rise of a Supreme Court bar and its effect on certiorari.	Swanson, Joseph W.		Mar 22, 2007	11054
Second-tier certiorari standard of review under Florida Law: a practitioner's guide.	Eichhorn, Cory W.		Feb 1, 2007	3409
Striking a balance to win: balancing the need to win the trial with the need to preserve the record on appeal.	Davis, Christine R.		Feb 1, 2007	4153
Understanding closing agreements.	Schnee, Edward J.		Oct 1, 2006	607
Appealing remand orders under the Class Action Fairness Act.	Horan, David L.		Sep 22, 2006	7967
California Court Of Appeal Rules Contractual Provisions To Submit Disputes To Judicial Referee Are Enforceable.		Case overview	Sep 21, 2006	926
Agreements To Submit Disputes To A Judicial Referee May Allow Employers To Avoid The Pitfalls Of Jury Trials And Arbitration.		Case overview	Sep 4, 2006	2854
In Guantanamo case, justices rein in executive power.	Chemerinsky, Erwin		Sep 1, 2006	1875
Calian Technologies Ltd.: Judicial Review Postponed.			Feb 21, 2006	309
Common law writs - from the practical to the extraordinary.	Reiter, Jack R.		Feb 1, 2006	4508
Courts of limited jurisdiction in a post-transition Cuba.	Travieso-Diaz, Matias F.; Musa, Armando A.		Jan 1, 2006	15478
An appellate mechanism for review of arbitral decisions in investor-state disputes: prospects and challenges.	Gantz, David A.		Jan 1, 2006	17324
Should Your California Agreements Contain a "Judicial Reference" Clause?			Aug 23, 2005	1821
Abuse of discretion: misunderstanding the deference accorded trial court rulings.	Whitmore, Laura		Jun 1, 2005	4039
Rip Van Winkle in Charterland.	Petter, Andrew		May 1, 2005	5403
All mixed up about mixed questions.	Warner, Randall H.		Mar 22, 2005	19861
Appeals during and after arbitration - state and federal issues.	Berman, Ceci Culpepper		Jan 1, 2005	2220
Protect Act amendment 'intimidates' judges, critics say.	Moen, Christian Harlan		May 1, 2004	1910
Containing Canakaris: tailoring Florida's one-size-fits-most standard of review.	Ryan, Nancy		Apr 1, 2004	3001
Post-WTO China and independent judicial review.	Killion, M. Ulric		Mar 22, 2004	19025
Is any sentence cruel and unusual punishment?	Chemerinsky, Erwin		May 1, 2003	1904
Court has jurisdiction to review equivalent hearings.	O'Driscoll, David		Jan 1, 2003	613
Arbitration and attorneys' fees: a pandora's box; with the recent Florida Supreme Court decision in Moser, expanded judicial review of arbitrations awards may become a reality.	Nussbaum, Frank; Tell, Meah Rothman		Oct 1, 2002	5755
Judicial Review Time Limits.			Sep 4, 2002	647
Shareholder Suits In Delaware: Delaware Supreme Court Applies High Standards of Review.			Jun 26, 2002	1886
Recent Developments in Judicial Review Procedure.			May 31, 2002	2056
Taking its toll: partisan judging and judicial review.	Broadwater, Jeff		Mar 22, 2002	14387
Pre-Action Protocol for Judicial Review.			Mar 4, 2002	1299
Federal appellate courts tilt toward defendants, study finds.	Scarlett, Thomas		Mar 1, 2002	401
Reflections upon judicial independence as we approach the bicentennial of Marbury v. Madison: safeguarding the constitution's "crown jewel".	Rosen, Gerald E.; Harding, Kyle W.		Feb 1, 2002	8042
Winning increased punitive awards after Cooper: Tort restrictionists may hail this Supreme Court decision as a victory, but in some cases it could lead to increased awards. (Cover Story).	Peck, Robert S.		Oct 1, 2001	3288
Northwood Inc. v. British Columbia (Forest Practices Board): deference within a standard of review of correctness?	Lovett, Deborah K.		Sep 1, 2001	12249
Plaintiff lawyer response.	Scarlett, Thomas		Jul 1, 2001	175
Findings of fact.	Scarlett, Thomas		Jul 1, 2001	167
Overshadowing the jury? High Court requires greater scrutiny of punitive damages.	Scarlett, Thomas		Jul 1, 2001	649
Supreme Court considers standard for review of punitive damages.	Scarlett, Thomas		Apr 1, 2001	545
Snyder house rules? The new deference in the review of quasi-judicial decisions.	Hainline, T.R., Jr.; Diebenow, Steven		Nov 1, 2000	3438
Peru's government and opposition squabble over reforms, but reach agreement on some.		Brief Article	Oct 12, 2000	578
Appellate standards of review.	Sepler, Harvey J.		Dec 1, 1999	5974
No partial termination of plan.	Yurkovic, Denis L.		Jun 1, 1999	1073
Small scale plan amendments: legislative or quasi-judicial in nature?	Wetherell, Kent		Apr 1, 1999	2795
Breakdown in the levels of scrutiny.	Chemerinsky, Erwin		Mar 1, 1997	1934
Taking liberties: lawyers above the law.	Carlin, David R., Jr.	Column	Oct 25, 1996	1117
Judicial sentencing: the soul of justice or a ghost in the machine?	Dripps, Donald A.		Apr 1, 1996	1661
Challenging federal appellate review of damage awards: lawyers should cite the forgotten second clause of the Seventh Amendment.	Chesebro, Kenneth J.		May 1, 1995	3069
Oregon high court upholds Oberg punitive damages award on second review.	Hellwege, Jean		May 1, 1995	627
Federal habeas review not needed, study says.	Brienza, Julie	Brief Article	Dec 1, 1994	284
Supreme Court to reconsider punitive damages - again.	Shoop, Julie Gannon		Apr 1, 1994	510