Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,735,205 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Joint Training Center for Indirect Fires Integration.


A joint training center should be established at Fort Sill Fort Sill, U.S. military reservation, Comanche co., SW Okla., 4 mi (6.4 km) N of Lawton; est. 1869 by Gen. Philip Sheridan. A 95,000-acre (38,445-hectare) field artillery and missile base, it is the home of the U.S. Army Artillery and Missile Center. , Oklahoma, to provide instruction and training on the integration, coordination and application of the full range of joint indirect fires. The US armed forces need a center to train members of the joint fires Fires produced during the employment of forces from two or more components in coordinated action toward a common objective. See also fires.  team in individual skills as well as command and staff competencies related to the synchronous application of the effects of joint indirect fires.

While we recognize an increasing interdependence between the services, we do not have a joint training center that focuses on the integration of fires and effects. Instead, we rely on service component schools to inform on service capabilities and train component elements of the joint fires team. A joint training center would allow commanders and joint fires teams to work in a well-crafted simulated environment while providing the potential for live-fire outcomes. The Joint Training Center for Indirect Fires Integration would fill a long-standing training shortfall.

The concept of establishing this Joint Training Center for Indirect Fires Integration fully supports the Chairman of the Joint Chief's Joint Fires Initiative to promote horizontal coordination among forces and components.

Future Warfare and Joint Requirements. To achieve decisive outcomes in future warfare, the armed forces of the United States A term used to denote collectively all components of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard. See also United States Armed Forces.  will execute coherent joint operations A general term to describe military actions conducted by joint forces or by Service forces in relationships (e.g., support, coordinating authority) which, of themselves, do not create joint forces.  based primarily on the integrated application of firepower fire·pow·er  
n.
1. The capacity, as of a weapon, weapons system, military unit, or position, for delivering fire.

2. The ability to deliver fire against an enemy in combat.

Noun 1.
 from each of the services. Multiple distributed operations Distributed Operations (DO) is a new warfighting concept being adopted by the United States Marine Corps and is being developed by their Warfighting Laboratory as a response to the changing environment of the Global War on Terror.  will be conducted simultaneously to achieve an overwhelming synergistic effect Synergistic effect

A violation of value-additivity in that the value of a combination is greater than the sum of the individual values.
.

The ability to successfully integrate the complementary indirect firepower capabilities of each service is essential to, achieving decision. By achieving integration, a full kinetic pulse can be delivered by indirect fires in multiple dimensions against enemy critical vulnerabilities and centers of gravity center of gravity
n. pl. centers of gravity
1. Abbr. CG The point in or near a body at which the gravitational potential energy of the body is equal to that of a single particle of the same mass located at that point
. Fires will be maneuvered throughout the battlespace to continuously sustain pressure at all levels--strategic, operational and tactical--by applying the most appropriate indirect fire means.

To achieve the effective and timely application of all fires and effects, we require a cohesive joint fires planning and execution process. Because we require forces that are immediately employable, including staffs at every level, those forces must train on and rehearse the critical skills associated with fires and effects application.

Providing joint training will greatly enhance the ability of forces to locate and track targets, select and task the correct fires delivery systems, generate desired effects The damage or casualties to the enemy or materiel that a commander desires to achieve from a nuclear weapon detonation. Damage effects on materiel are classified as light, moderate, or severe. Casualty effects on personnel may be immediate, prompt, or delayed. , assess results and reengage targets, as required.

Although advances in command and control capabilities have enabled the joint force to become more integrated, our command, control and communications systems, our targeting processes and the means by which we plan and execute fires are not yet fully integrated. We continue to organize and execute by service component rather than by functionally oriented headquarters.

Training Facility for Joint Fires. The US Army Field Artillery Center has begun a cooperative effort with the Institute for Creative Technologies (ICT (1) (Information and Communications Technology) An umbrella term for the information technology field. See IT.

(2) (International Computers and Tabulators) See ICL.

1. (testing) ICT - In Circuit Test.
), a government-funded university research facility associated with the University of Southern California The U.S. News & World Report ranked USC 27th among all universities in the United States in its 2008 ranking of "America's Best Colleges", also designating it as one of the "most selective universities" for admitting 8,634 of the almost 34,000 who applied for freshman admission , to create a joint fires and effects training capability. A training facility is being established at Fort Sill that will leverage ICT immersive training technologies to train the application of joint fires. It also will serve as a test bed for developing Objective Force training capabilities.

This facility will leverage revolutionary training technologies--virtual reality, artificial intelligence and simulations--with the potential to achieve live-fire outcomes. It will train personnel from all services to request and employ fires as universal observers; to develop staff capabilities to coordinate and synchronize See synchronization.  fires; and to train observers in the application of joint effects in an urban environment.

The training system will replicate the visual and aural aural /au·ral/ (aw´r'l)
1. auditory (1).

2. pertaining to an aura.


au·ral 1
adj.
Relating to or perceived by the ear.
 conditions of employing different lethal systems and combinations of systems against a wide array of enemy target sets. Scenarios will be developed to enable training across the. full spectrum of operations in variable environments and conditions.

The facility will be able to train situations that present dilemmas, such as the presence of noncombatants on the battlefield, the potential for fratricide frat·ri·cide  
n.
1. The killing of one's brother or sister.

2. One who has killed one's brother or sister.



[Middle English, from Old French, from Latin
 and the need to avoid collateral damage collateral damage Surgery A popular term for any undesired but unavoidable co-morbidity associated with a therapy–eg, chemotherapy-induced CD to the BM and GI tract as a side effect of destroying tumor cells . The intent is to be able to train the application of any indirect fire capability from any service in any environment.

Using advanced virtual reality and simulation technology to create an, experiential learning environment is an" efficient and cost-effective supplement to large-scale military exercises. The integration skills developed by individuals and staffs can then be applied with greater effectiveness in other training environments. such as force-on-force joint training at our combat training centers (CTCs).

Our current training facilities replicate neither lethal and nonlethal fires realistically and effectively nor the full range of capabilities that our emerging doctrine directs. Our CTCs must continue to provide tough, realistic training scenarios for maneuver operations, but they must be able to better replicate the application and effects of the full range of joint and land-based, indirect fires. We need to train as we intend to fight.

From the perspective of those who must integrate fires and effects, warfare is becoming increasingly complex and more reliant on joint indirect fires. The time has come to truly integrate the indirect fires capabilities of the services and, most especially, to train those who are engaged in integrating fires and effects.

The need for a Joint Training Center for Indirect Fires Integration is essential to our future.
COPYRIGHT 2003 U.S. Field Artillery Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Major General Maples, Michael D.
Publication:FA Journal
Date:May 1, 2003
Words:861
Previous Article:NLOS battalion fires and effects in the UA of 2015.
Next Article:Cannons in early entry operations: Millennium Challenge 2002.



Related Articles
Training to reverse CTC Negative Trends: Getting fires back into the close fight.(combat training centers)
FA essential to current and future force success. (The Update Point).(field artillery)(Column)
Forward observer battle drills -- the time is now.(Joint Readiness Training Centre)
Extending the eyes of the ETAC via FO ECAS training: the 101st joint fires training strategy.(the need for forward observers to be trained to help...
Fires first in combat--train the way we fight. (The Update Point).
Indirect fires first--the American way of war. (Interview).(Interview)
Relevant and ready: the FA now and in the future.
Training a ready and relevant Army at war.(Interview)(Interview)
Building the tactical-level Joint Fires Team (JFT).(Joint terminal attack controller)
Combat identification training: Recognition of Combat Vehicles program.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles