Janice J. Terry. U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East: The Role of Lobbies and Special Interest Groups.Janice J. Terry. U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East: The Role of Lobbies and Special Interest Groups. London: Pluto Press Pluto Press is a progressive, independent publisher based in London. It was founded in 1969 by Richard Kuper and others as an arm of International Socialism, the forerunner of the Socialist Workers Party in the UK. , 2005, 160 pages. Paper $24.95. It is commonly acknowledged that lobbies play a large role in shaping policy and that the pro-Israel lobby enjoys a near-monopoly on U.S. foreign policy formulations. The issue of lobbies per se has been a subject of debate as of late since they enjoy an inordinate degree of eminence eminence /em·i·nence/ (em´i-nens) a projection or boss. caudal eminence a taillike eminence in the early embryo, the remnant of the primitive node and the precursor of hindgut, adjacent in this country. This contrasts sharply with the minimal role that political lobbies play in other Western democracies. Only in this presidential democracy are lobbies able to marshal votes and monetary resources in the game of influencing policy makers. No one, for instance, questions the power of the pro-Israel lobby in this country, which has been described as the most potent influence on foreign policy since the demise of that of the Nationalist Republic of China. The subject of several studies in the past, such as Edward N. Tivnan's The Lobby: Jewish Political Power and American Foreign Policy (1987), the pro-Israel lobby has an established reputation for being an effective king-maker. It has also been credited with the making and unmaking of several political careers. American lobbies are, more importantly, significantly superior to voter behavior and opinion polls in their impact on foreign policy decision-making. That is why Janice Terry has chosen to focus on this informal input into foreign policy, which, in the case of the pro-Israel lobby, has been very successful in tilting U.S. policy overwhelmingly towards Israel. Her intent is to investigate how domestic and international inputs shape foreign policy decisions by using the Ford and Carter administrations as two contrasting case studies of the limitations on presidential powers The executive authority given to the president of the United States by Article II of the Constitution to carry out the duties of the office. Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution provides that the "executive power shall be vested in a President of the United . Terry also examines the context in which American foreign policy is shaped, from the impact of popular culture to the power of certain ethnic special interest groups such as Jewish American organizations. She takes a stab at the contrasting effectiveness of the Greek and Turkish lobbies as well, particularly as they impact U.S. policy towards Cyprus. Underlying all of this is the overriding question: where are the Arab lobbies, and if they do exist, what issues do they normally champion? The plan of the book is to begin at the top by examining the role of presidential advisors as they facilitate the pro-Israel lobby's access to the presidential office. These are the ones who transmit and translate the significance of Jewish voting numbers and advise on policy matters during election campaigns in such a way as to marginalize mar·gin·al·ize tr.v. mar·gin·al·ized, mar·gin·al·iz·ing, mar·gin·al·iz·es To relegate or confine to a lower or outer limit or edge, as of social standing. Arab-American voting power. But Terry asserts that the media and popular culture also play a role in shaping U.S. Middle Eastern policy. The media, in particular, stand accused of often adopting an uncritical view of presidential and White House policy statements. By defining what is "newsworthy news·wor·thy adj. news·wor·thi·er, news·wor·thi·est Of sufficient interest or importance to the public to warrant reporting in the media. news " in this manner, the greatest democratic check on policy matters is effectively neutralized neu·tral·ize tr.v. neu·tral·ized, neu·tral·iz·ing, neu·tral·iz·es 1. To make neutral. 2. To counterbalance or counteract the effect of; render ineffective. 3. . The media's role in directly or indirectly reinforcing pro-Israel policies illustrates the basic shortcomings A shortcoming is a character flaw. Shortcomings may also be:
intr.v. per·tained, per·tain·ing, per·tains 1. To have reference; relate: evidence that pertains to the accident. 2. to foreign policy-making pol·i·cy·mak·ing or pol·i·cy-mak·ing n. High-level development of policy, especially official government policy. adj. Of, relating to, or involving the making of high-level policy: . The conservative media, moreover, confine their choice of news and foreign experts to pro-Israel think-tanks. Although there are over 6,000 Middle East academic experts in the U.S., only the partisan few are ever invited to debate major foreign policy issues. This problem is compounded by the paucity pau·ci·ty n. 1. Smallness of number; fewness. 2. Scarcity; dearth: a paucity of natural resources. of international coverage in the American media which insulate the average American reader against learning about current foreign policy stories. Under the heading, "Production Aspects: Lobby Techniques and Finances," Terry presents a thoroughly professional assessment of lobbies in the U.S., particularly those which bear on Middle East policies. She describes and analyzes the seminal role played by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is a national advocacy group that lobbies for U.S. support to the nation of Israel. Founded in 1951, AIPAC has grown into a 65,000-member organization that is recognized as one of the most influential foreign policy groups in the United (AIPAC AIPAC American Israel Public Affairs Committee AIPAC Advanced Interconnection Technology for Electronics for Portugal (ESPRIT project 7502) ) in influencing Mid-East policy. From its publications, such as Facts and Myths, and Near East Report, which are regularly fed to influential policy-makers, to its mobilization of the Jewish American voter at election time, to its saturation campaigns targeting legislators via letter, telephone and fax machine, AIPAC stands out among the rest of the lobbies as the most effective special interest groups around. This picture is contrasted with the weakness or sheer absence of Arab lobbies. Pro-Israel views, she observes, are often transmitted to American presidents through direct contact by personal friends or prominent figures. Here she cites Truman's friend Eddie Jacobson and Ford's warm relationship with Max Fisher Max M. Fisher, J.D., (July 151908-March 32005) was an American businessman and philanthropist. He was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to Russian immigrant parents. He was the Honorary Chairman of United Jewish Communities (UJC). , a Michigan businessman and effective fund-raiser for the Republican Party. Terry observes that no Arab American Arab Americans are Americans of Arab ancestry and constitute an ethnicity made up of several waves of immigrants from twenty-two Arab countries, stretching from Morocco in the west to Oman in the south east to Iraq in the north. personality has ever risen to such a rank in recent American history. Neither has there ever been such Arab-American interest in pushing the Palestinian cause on elected officials. She also describes "political philanthropy" as an old Zionist practice in this country and a relatively recent endeavor for Arabs and Arab-American groups. Terry devotes a chapter to what currently exists in the way of pro-Arab lobbies and interest groups. She reports wryly that many Arab officials, including Nasser of Egypt, either did not understand what a lobby was or considered lobbying to be an illegal activity. Special attention is paid to the role of ARAMCO as a pro-Saudi lobby and to the occasional practice of hiring professional lobbyists as in Kuwait's contracting of the firm of Hill and Knowlton to disseminate Iraqi abuses during the invasion of Kuwait The Invasion of Kuwait, also known as the Iraq-Kuwait War, was a major conflict between the Republic of Iraq and the State of Kuwait which resulted in the 7 month long Iraqi occupation of Kuwait[4] . The description of the Saudi royal family's efforts to impact U.S. Middle East policy remains contained and balanced. She attributes the White House open access enjoyed by Saudi ambassador Bandar ibn Sultan to his long years in office, and the royal family's influence to its long association with the Bush family. None of these factors, however, succeeded in shaping U.S. policy towards the Palestinians. The author refrains from indulging in the kinds of exaggeration seen in several recent studies on this subject. Witness, for instance, Steven Emerson's The American House of Saud The House of Saud (آل سعود transliteration: Āl Suʿūd : The Secret Petrodollar petrodollar Noun money earned by a country by exporting petroleum Connection (1985) and the more recent Craig Unger's House of Bush, House of Saud (2004). In most of these, the evidence, based on sensational news reporting, does not match the outcomes. Terry also refers to the PLO's belated be·lat·ed adj. Having been delayed; done or sent too late: a belated birthday card. [be- + lated. and weak efforts in this regard, as well as, the Arab League Arab League, popular name for the League of Arab States, formed in 1945 in an attempt to give political expression to the Arab nations. of States' consummate lack of understanding of the dynamics of U.S. policy-making. The League's effectiveness, furthermore, is seriously hobbled by its inter-state rivalries and policy differences. The author's discussion of the Mid-East policies of two administrations centers around two cases. One revolves around the manipulation of the Ford presidency by Jewish American organizations in favor of penalizing any American compliance with the Arab boycott against Israel, the other describes pressures brought against the Carter presidency's intent to offer a better deal to the Palestinians during the Camp David Camp David, U.S. presidential retreat, located in Catoctin Mountain Park (see National Parks and Monuments, table), in NW Md. The Camp David accords, the terms of a peace treaty between Egypt and Israel, were established (1978) at this site; other negotiations and negotiations. In summary, this is a well-rounded and factual treatment of a very crucial aspect of U.S. foreign policy making. To claim that it is a timely treatment would simply belabor be·la·bor tr.v. be·la·bored, be·la·bor·ing, be·la·bors 1. To attack with blows; hit, beat, or whip. See Synonyms at beat. 2. To assail verbally. 3. the point. Indeed, one could make the claim that no understanding of American foreign-policy decision making is possible without understanding the role of lobbies and interest groups. This book goes beyond these bounds by also examining the culture which spawns such anti-Muslim and anti-Arab views and facilitates the influence of the pro-Israel lobby. The success of the pro-Israel lobby can also be the result of the general ignorance of the American public regarding Middle Eastern people and their legitimate aspirations. The author is very candid about the failures of any Arab lobbying effort and the sheer absence of credible Arab voices in Washington. By juxtaposing the description of the pro-Israel lobby and its effective power with the visible weakness of Arab lobbying efforts and influence, Terry has succeeded in driving home a very important point, namely that the absence of one kind of influence opens room for manipulation by the other. The book also breaks fresh ground by tracing the role of special interest groups through presidential papers and official documents. Here is a very successful mix of archival and secondary research and an admirable ability to pose the right questions. In the process, not only is the nature of Zionist near-monopoly over foreign policy decision-making demystified, but also the failures of Arab influence are critically analyzed. This is a must reading for students and scholars of U.S. Middle East policy and for the study of special interest groups in general. The study is also an unbiased treatment of the successes and failures of American presidents in managing their country's foreign policy. Reviewed by Ghada Hashem Talhami Ghada Hashem Talhami is D. K. Pearsons Professor of Politics at Lake Forest College The College's current Chair of the Board of Trustees is financier Peter G. Schiff, a graduate with the class of 1974. [2] Lake Forest College is located at 555 North Sheridan Road, Lake Forest, IL 60045. U.S.A. , Illinois. |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion