Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,634,800 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Jackson v. Ashcroft.


U.S. District Court

GOOD TIME CREDIT

Jackson v. Ashcroft, 347 F.Supp.2d 924 (D.Or. 2004). A federal prisoner petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus Noun 1. writ of habeas corpus - a writ ordering a prisoner to be brought before a judge
habeas corpus

judicial writ, writ - (law) a legal document issued by a court or judicial officer
, challenging the federal Bureau of Prisons' (BOP) computation Computation is a general term for any type of information processing that can be represented mathematically. This includes phenomena ranging from simple calculations to human thinking.  of his good-time credits. The district court denied the petition, finding that the BOP regulation that used the amount of time actually served by the prisoner as the basis for prorating prorating (prōrā´ting),
n a clause in a contract with participating dental professionals wherein they agree to accept a percentage reduction in their billings to offset the amount by which the total cost of
 good-time credits, rather than the sentence imposed, was a reasonable interpretation of the statute governing the allocation of good-time credits. (Federal Bureau of Prisons Noun 1. Federal Bureau of Prisons - the law enforcement agency of the Justice Department that operates a nationwide system of prisons and detention facilities to incarcerate inmates sentenced to imprisonment for federal crimes
BoP
, Oregon)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:GOOD TIME
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Feb 1, 2005
Words:92
Previous Article:Waterman v. Commandant, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks.(FREE SPEECH, EXPRESSION, ASSOC.)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Sash v. Zenk.(GOOD TIME)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
'Conservative' and 'Racist': The Ashcroft nomination and the Left's foulest card.(Attorney General nominee John Ashcroft)
On the Right - The Perils of Being John Ashcroft.
Et Tu, Feingold?(Senator Russ Feingold supports confirmation of John Ashcroft as Attorney General)
State lawyers press defense of suicide law.(Health)(Federal court: Both sides file arguments on Ashcroft's attempt to block the Oregon statute.)
Gun rights guaranteed?(Editorials)(AG reverses longtime Second Amendment policy)(Editorial)
Second thoughts. (Ashcroft's 'Reasonable Restrictions').(John Ashcroft, General attorney; United States)(Brief Article)
John Ashcroft: making a federal case out of sin.(Up front: news and opinion from independent minds)
Report belies Ashcroft Probe cites credible claims of rights violations.(Editorials)(Editorial)
Jackson v. Ashcroft.(HABEAS CORPUS)(Brief Article)
Oregon suicide law comes to high court.(Courts)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles